HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Complicating the network: The year in social media research
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 1, 2010, 10 a.m.

The right information, the right way, at the right time

You hear a lot said about how news organizations need to help people “make sense of the world.” I’ve used the idea myself to show how news organizations need to realize they sell convenience, not news. We all kind of know what we mean by the concept, but it doesn’t have a clear definition.

On Thursday, I encountered that made that meaning clear to me.

At 5:30 a.m., I got a text message from one of my local television stations alerting me that my kids’ school was closed because of an impending snowstorm. This was a valuable bit of information. Getting it by text was incredibly convenient: My phone buzzed on my bedside table, alerting me to the text. I didn’t even have to get out of bed. I turned off my alarm and slept in, a rare luxury in my frenetic life.

Around noon, I got a second text message from the TV station, advising me my 2 p.m. graduate school class was cancelled. I was sitting in the Syracuse University library at the time, eating my lunch, so again getting a text was preferable to any other mode of communication for me at that moment.

I got these texts because months ago, I had signed up on the TV station’s web site. I was able to pick the schools for which I wanted text or email alerts. It took less than 10 seconds.

Making sense of the world

This TV station gave me the specific information I wanted the way I wanted it and when I wanted it. Sure, I could climb out of bed, fire up my laptop, and read the school closings from a long list. Or I could do it the old-fashioned way and listen through a recitation of closures on the radio, hoping I had tuned in at the right moment to hear my kids’ school. Or I could watch the scrolling list at the bottom of a TV screen.

None of these other options are really arduous. But wasn’t it nice that a news organization brought the very information I wanted to me the way I wanted it? I don’t need to know what other schools are closed. I just want to know about my kids’ school. That’s the heart of the niche-based way of thinking that dominates on the Internet — a way of thinking that news organizations must embrace or they’ll continue their downward readership trend.

Text alerts of school closing won’t save journalism. And I know my local TV station is not unique; in some communities, school districts themselves text the parents about closures. My point is that this type of service — reader-directed and selected — engenders loyalty. Lots of these type of services can make a news site a destination community members will always remember to check.

It’s notable that the way I heard about these text alerts was from other mom friends, who thought the service was so great they felt compelled to tell everyone they know with kids. That’s the real gold standard in marketing: Customers who love something about your product so much that they can’t help but spread the word.

The station didn’t make any money off me (although I’d gladly pay for this service), but it gained a lot of my goodwill. I think this idea could be applied to other areas to help people navigate their communities that could make money. I’d love to be able to go to my local newspaper or TV station website and sign up for text coupon alerts from specific stores. I’d welcome being able to sign up for special deals from stores I pick that come right to my phone. Then I’d just give the code to the clerk, rather than have to remember to bring a direct-mail or newspaper coupon to the store with me.

Again, the core idea isn’t new — I could search the web now for discount codes. But I don’t really feel like it. That’s where the selling convenience comes in: You save me time, and you’ve saved me something I value. I’d appreciate any news organization that let me select what I want, when I want it, and how I want it. And that’s something I’d be willing to pay for.

Photo by Ian Iott used under a Creative Commons license.

POSTED     March 1, 2010, 10 a.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Complicating the network: The year in social media research
Journalist’s Resource sifts through the academic journals so you don’t have to. Here are 12 of the studies about social and digital media they found most interesting in 2014.
News in a remix-focused culture
“We have to stop thinking about how to leverage whatever hot social platform is making headlines and instead spend time understanding how communication is changing.”
Los Angeles is the content future
“Creative content people are frustrated with the industry and creating their content on their own terms. Sound familiar?”
What to read next
429
tweets
What’s the right news experience on a phone? Stacy-Marie Ishmael and BuzzFeed are trying to figure it out
“Nobody has to read you. You have to earn that. You have to respect people’s attention.”
401Complicating the network: The year in social media research
Journalist’s Resource sifts through the academic journals so you don’t have to. Here are 12 of the studies about social and digital media they found most interesting in 2014.
343Come work for Nieman Lab
We have an opening for a staff writer in our Cambridge newsroom.
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
The Daily Telegraph
Neighborlogs
Tumblr
The Seattle Times
Lens
Foreign Policy
The Boston Globe
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Politico
The Blaze
The Weekly Standard
Ushahidi