Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Newsonomics: On end games and end times
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Feb. 9, 2011, 2:30 p.m.

Wait, everyone! TBD’s not dead, but changes coming with TV takeover

Big news for TBD today: The site, the Washington Post reported, is being taken over by owner Allbritton Communications’ TV station, WJLA. (On its six-month birthday, no less.)

This seemed, at first blush, dire news. (Jeff Jarvis: “I’m sitting shiva for TBD.com. So young.”) TBD has been known, after all — despite its corporate owner and TV partnership — for a particularly web-based approach to reporting that’s emphasized, above all, community engagement. Many of its biggest successes, so far, have been based on the kind of work that comes from an interactive, rather than broadcast-based, relationship with readers.

But Erik Wemple, TBD’s editor-in-chief, says to put your funeral clothes away, everyone. TBD’s web-centric approach, shakeup notwithstanding, is still alive, and the outlet, though restructured, is still kicking. “Bad news in the media industry these days means that people are getting laid off — and no one’s getting laid off here,” Wemple told me. “We’re not shrinking”; in fact, “I would imagine our head count, if anything, would go up.”

The biggest immediate change that the shift will entail is the creation of a new website, WJLA.com, which will function as a companion site for TBD.com. The hope in that is expansion, rather than compression. “The idea there is to catch the traditional JLA audience, which is a bit more suburban, and the new TBD audience, which is a little more packed into the inner core of the District and the inner suburbs,” Wemple said — and, through that, to “maximize both audiences.”

Of course, time will tell whether and how the new TV station oversight will otherwise affect TBD’s editorial approaches. Broadcast and web, after all, have to a certain extent contradictory aims. And Jim Brady, who recently departed as TBD’s general manager, is tweeting another perspective: “At good companies, the people who resist necessary change are pushed aside. At bad companies, they are put in charge. RIP, the old TBD.” And: “I love my @TBD peeps, but the ‘everything will be OK’ tweet does not reflect how people feel. They can’t say it, but I can. Not good news.”

In the long run, though, there could be some interesting symbioses that emerge from the new structure. “We have to see how the companion site interpolates with the existing site — and I think there are technical and workflow issues to surmount there,” Wemple said. “But, for me, the ultimate thing by which I judge any ownership or enterprise is the level of investment — and the level of investment continues to be robust.”

And what about the community engagement work that has been at the core of TBD’s editorial (and, to some extent, business) philosophy? “Our community engagement runs so much through everyone here,” Wemple noted — “I wouldn’t want to work here if were weren’t deeply involved in getting out to the community.”

“I would just ask that people judge the product,” Wemple said. “I think that we will continue to emphasize and to engage the community in a way that is very competitive with the industry and industry standards.” And while, for a meta-media world that’s been watching TBD’s fortunes with fascination, today’s shakeup seems a blow, users themselves might see things differently. “I think that 99 percent of the people won’t really notice too much of a change,” Wemple said. And, furthermore: “I believe that most of our staff won’t feel this change too much. They’re going to continue cranking out stories, day in and day out.”

POSTED     Feb. 9, 2011, 2:30 p.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Newsonomics: On end games and end times
Can publishers find a sustainable business model this new age of Facebook/Apple/Snapchat/Twitter/Google distributed content? And is local news destined to be left behind?
What Scribd’s growing pains mean for the future of digital content subscription models
It turns out that ebook subscription models don’t work very well when people read too much. So what happens next?
How research (and PowerPoints) became the backbone of National Journal’s membership program
“We no longer look at National Journal simply as a news source, but as a collection of resources, as well as a collection of experts we can turn to on occasion.”
What to read next
2843
tweets
A blow for mobile advertising: The next version of Safari will let users block ads on iPhones and iPads
Think making money on mobile advertising is hard now? Think how much more difficult it will be with a significant share of your audience is blocking all your ads — all with a simple download from the App Store.
1763For news organizations, this was the most important set of Apple announcements in years
A new Flipboard-clone with massive potential reach, R.I.P. Newsstand, and news stories embedded deeper inside iOS — it was a big day for news on iPhones and iPads.
762Newsonomics: 10 numbers that define the news business today
From video to social, from mobile to paywalls — these data points help define where we are in the “future of news” today, like it or not.
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Fuego is our heat-seeking Twitter bot, tracking the links the future-of-journalism crowd is talking about most on Twitter.
Here are a few of the top links Fuego’s currently watching.   Get the full Fuego ➚