HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Newsonomics: BuzzFeed and The New York Times play Facebook’s ubiquity game
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Feb. 9, 2011, 2:30 p.m.

Wait, everyone! TBD’s not dead, but changes coming with TV takeover

Big news for TBD today: The site, the Washington Post reported, is being taken over by owner Allbritton Communications’ TV station, WJLA. (On its six-month birthday, no less.)

This seemed, at first blush, dire news. (Jeff Jarvis: “I’m sitting shiva for TBD.com. So young.”) TBD has been known, after all — despite its corporate owner and TV partnership — for a particularly web-based approach to reporting that’s emphasized, above all, community engagement. Many of its biggest successes, so far, have been based on the kind of work that comes from an interactive, rather than broadcast-based, relationship with readers.

But Erik Wemple, TBD’s editor-in-chief, says to put your funeral clothes away, everyone. TBD’s web-centric approach, shakeup notwithstanding, is still alive, and the outlet, though restructured, is still kicking. “Bad news in the media industry these days means that people are getting laid off — and no one’s getting laid off here,” Wemple told me. “We’re not shrinking”; in fact, “I would imagine our head count, if anything, would go up.”

The biggest immediate change that the shift will entail is the creation of a new website, WJLA.com, which will function as a companion site for TBD.com. The hope in that is expansion, rather than compression. “The idea there is to catch the traditional JLA audience, which is a bit more suburban, and the new TBD audience, which is a little more packed into the inner core of the District and the inner suburbs,” Wemple said — and, through that, to “maximize both audiences.”

Of course, time will tell whether and how the new TV station oversight will otherwise affect TBD’s editorial approaches. Broadcast and web, after all, have to a certain extent contradictory aims. And Jim Brady, who recently departed as TBD’s general manager, is tweeting another perspective: “At good companies, the people who resist necessary change are pushed aside. At bad companies, they are put in charge. RIP, the old TBD.” And: “I love my @TBD peeps, but the ‘everything will be OK’ tweet does not reflect how people feel. They can’t say it, but I can. Not good news.”

In the long run, though, there could be some interesting symbioses that emerge from the new structure. “We have to see how the companion site interpolates with the existing site — and I think there are technical and workflow issues to surmount there,” Wemple said. “But, for me, the ultimate thing by which I judge any ownership or enterprise is the level of investment — and the level of investment continues to be robust.”

And what about the community engagement work that has been at the core of TBD’s editorial (and, to some extent, business) philosophy? “Our community engagement runs so much through everyone here,” Wemple noted — “I wouldn’t want to work here if were weren’t deeply involved in getting out to the community.”

“I would just ask that people judge the product,” Wemple said. “I think that we will continue to emphasize and to engage the community in a way that is very competitive with the industry and industry standards.” And while, for a meta-media world that’s been watching TBD’s fortunes with fascination, today’s shakeup seems a blow, users themselves might see things differently. “I think that 99 percent of the people won’t really notice too much of a change,” Wemple said. And, furthermore: “I believe that most of our staff won’t feel this change too much. They’re going to continue cranking out stories, day in and day out.”

POSTED     Feb. 9, 2011, 2:30 p.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Newsonomics: BuzzFeed and The New York Times play Facebook’s ubiquity game
The ubiquity game has different rules for digital startups than for legacy businesses. But for both, figuring out the right relationship with Facebook is key to their audience strategies.
Jeff Israely: Good content marketing benefits from a smart publisher’s touch
Our startup correspondent, building Worldcrunch in Paris, on the thinking behind its operation’s pivot: “The smart brands know they’ll lose your attention if they use this new publishing power simply to push their merchandise.”
How a hobby foreign affairs blog became a paywalled news destination — and a business
World Politics Review has grown from one man’s side project to a small news operation supported by a niche paywall.
What to read next
2481
tweets
Millennials say keeping up with the news is important to them — but good luck getting them to pay for it
The new report from the Media Insight Project looks at millennials’ habits and attitudes toward news consumption: “I really wouldn’t pay for any type of news because as a citizen it’s my right to know the news.”
926The next stage in the battle for our attention: Our wrists
News companies have moved from print dollars to digital dimes to mobile pennies. Now, with the highly anticipated launch of the Apple Watch, the screens are getting even smaller. How are smart publishers thinking about the right way to serve users and maintain their attention on smartwatches?
705A wave of distributed content is coming — will publishers sink or swim?
Instead of just publishing to their own websites, news organizations are being asked to publish directly to platforms they don’t control. Is the hunt for readers enough to justify losing some independence?
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism
Voice Media Group
The New York Times
New Jersey Newsroom
California Watch
Sacramento Press
New York
New Haven Independent
Reuters
Arizona Guardian
Newsday
Press+