Twitter  The newsonomics of the Kyiv Post’s embattled work nie.mn/1l87jD2  
Nieman Journalism Lab
Pushing to the future of journalism — A project of the Nieman Foundation at Harvard

Why ProPublica is publishing web ads — and what that means for the nonprofit outfit’s funding future

Check out ProPublica’s website today, and you might notice — along with blog posts, donation buttons, links to special projects, and the kind of deep-dive investigative journalism that the nonprofit outfit is celebrated for — a new feature: advertisements. Starting today, the outfit is serving ads on its site to complement the funding it takes in from foundation support and reader contributions, its two primary revenue streams.

“This has been something we’ve been expecting to do for some time,” Richard Tofel, ProPublica’s general manager, told me in a phone call. “It was a question of when.”

ProPublica isn’t alone in venturing into the realm of dot-org advertising. A number of ProPublica’s nonprofit peers, California Watch, Texas Tribune, Voice of San Diego, and MinnPost among them, already run sponsored messages on their sites, served directly and via community partnerships and corporate underwriting. As Tofel noted in a blog post explaining the decision to take on ad support: “We’re doing this for the usual reason: to help raise revenue that can fuel our operations, promoting what people in the non-profit world call ‘sustainability.’”

The revenue raised, though, won’t likely be much in comparison to that offered by ProPublica’s other funding streams. The site had 1,300 donors in 2010, Tofel notes, providing $3.8 million on top of the funding provided by the Sandler Foundation; web advertising being what it is, the revenue that comes from the ads will likely be a trickle compared to the site’s donation-based funding streams. “Given what’s happened to web advertising in the last five years, on any kind of reasonable projection of the size of our audience” — though the number fluctuates, ProPublica currently averages a little more than a million pageviews a month, he told me — “we’re not talking about a great deal of money.”

So HuffPost this is not. And that will be true not only in terms of the revenue generated by the ads, but also in terms of their content itself. ProPublica’s ads will be served as part of the Public Media Interactive Network, a digital ad network — operated by National Public Media — that started in 2008 to sell remnant ad space on NPR.org and PBS.org, but which recently expanded to include nonprofit news sites. (According to this press release, Texas Tribune and MinnPost are also members.) The network sells packages; publishers can either opt into or opt out of running those packages’ ads on their sites. And while “we’ve looked at the range of their clients, and I don’t see any at the moment that we’d have a problem with,” Tofel notes — none of those “lose inches of belly fat!” monstrosities here, folks — ultimately, “it’s our decision about whether to accept a particular advertiser that they have found.” As ProPublica explains in its new Advertising Acceptability Policy statement:

First, ProPublica reserves the right to accept or decline any advertisement or sponsorship it is offered.

ProPublica will decline to accept advertising that it knows or believes to be misleading, inaccurate, fraudulent or illegal, or that fails to comply, in ProPublica’s sole discretion, with its standards of decency, taste or dignity.

ProPublica, like all quality publishers of original journalism, maintains a clear separation between news and advertising content. Advertising that attempts to blur this distinction in a manner that, in ProPublica’s sole judgment, confuses readers will be rejected.

It’s an expect-the-best/prepare-for-the-worst approach to ceding a bit of control over what readers see when they visit the site, Tofel explained. “You just want to leave yourself the latitude so that you don’t get into a situation that is uncomfortable — or that undermines, most importantly, readers’ faith in what they’re reading.”

And that transaction with readers — one that, ultimately, understands an audience not as an anonymous collective of eyeballs and click-givers, but as individuals and, in the best sense, message-amplifiers — will remain a constant even as ProPublica tweaks its revenue strategy. As will, Tofel notes, the outlet’s partnerships with other news organizations (48 last year alone!) — and its rare-in-the-media-world comfort with sending users away to other outlets, partner and otherwise. While, yes, the inclusion of web ads represents an interest in keeping — and growing — direct traffic to ProPublica’s own site, “we are not in business to make money,” Tofel says. “We are in business to make change. And that’s still very much the case. But we do need to come up with enough money to float the boat, not just today and tomorrow, but on into the future.”

                                   
What to read next
newsrevbatsell
Jake Batsell    April 15, 2014
The daylong summit on new models for supporting journalism examines how the Texas Tribune diversified its funding, the injection of venture capital and private wealth into media, and the future of philanthropy for news.
  • http://civic.mit.edu Andrew Whitacre

    Megan, did Rich happen to mention what he’d consider their baseline for success with ads? For example, how would ProPublica come to the conclusion “Wow, this is really working–we should dedicate some more resources/page space to ads” vs. “Turns out this isn’t worth the reader’s attention–let’s drop the ads so they can focus 100% on the articles.”

  • Megan Garber

    Hi, Andrew — We didn’t talk baseline specifically, but I think the general idea is that relatively unobtrusive ads — of the variety that are already on display, so to speak, on some of ProPublica’s peer sites — won’t represent a significant tax on reader attention. And thus that, while advertising will most likely never be a huge source of money for the outlet, the additional revenue it generates will come at a not-too-high cost in terms of brand, user experience, etc.

  • http://minnpost.com Joel Kramer

    To clarify, the vast majority of MinnPost’s ad and sponsorship revenue comes from in-house sales to local advertisers. We use Public Media Interactive Network (and one other network) to fill inventory that we haven’t sold locally.

  • Scott Leadingham

    Correct me if I’m wrong (Joel Kramer or others) but MinnPost used to use Google AdSense. I haven’t been reading MinnPost on a regular basis for a while (not for any reason; I’m still a big fan) but I haven’t noticed any ads lately from that source. Off the top of my head, I can’t remember any other nonprofit news sites I’ve seen that use Google (I’ll go check).

  • http://minnpost.com Joel Kramer

    MinnPost tried out Google’s networked banner ads for a while, but stopped using them, both because of the low revenue and the mix of ads.

  • Pingback: Links 6/1/2011: Beta of PowerTOP 2.0, Android Chosen by Almost Majority of Buyers | Techrights

  • Pingback: Pourquoi ProPublica se met-il à la publicité ? » Article » OWNI, Digital Journalism

  • Pingback: Clube de Jornalistas » EUA: Sitios de jornalismo sem fins lucrativos recorrem à publicidade

  • Pingback: 1,900 copies: How a top-selling Kindle Single is generating new audiences for ProPublica » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism