HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Newsonomics: BuzzFeed and The New York Times play Facebook’s ubiquity game
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 3, 2011, 12:30 p.m.

Google will begin integrating journalists’ Google-ized identities into Google News

The personal branding of journalists makes its way onto Google’s news aggregator.

Last summer, Google began an experiment with journalists and authorship, linking writers’ identities and their work by placing author headshots and links to their Google+ profiles next to news results from Google search. Late yesterday afternoon, it extended the effort, announcing that it will begin rolling out the producer-and-product connection to its news platform. “When reporters link their Google profile with their articles,” Google’s Eric Weigle wrote in a blog post,

Google News now shows the writer’s name and how many Google+ users have that person in their circles. For the lead article for each story, Google News also shows that reporter’s profile picture and enables readers to add them to their Google+ circles right from the Google News homepage.

The move is an extension of a pilot project launched this summer, one that gave authors’ (Google+) identities placement in Google search returns. (We at the Lab have been part of that experiment.) “Authorship is a great way to identify and highlight high-quality content,” Google’s Sagar Kamdar noted at the time. “Plus, the web is centered around people. People discovering content on the web often want to learn more about its author, see other content by that author, and even interact with the author.”

All true. And this week’s extension of the author layer to Google News is largely — largely — to the good. As Kamdar, announcing the new feature yesterday (on Google+, natch) noted, the Google News extension has been “one of the most requested features for authorship.” Journalistic transparency is almost always good; same deal for the features that allow for connections between journalism’s producers and its consumers.

But then: An intermittently author-ified search platform — the kind we had in Google’s experiment with authored-up search returns — is different from a blanketly author-ified news platform. Consumers come to Google.com and News.google.com with, often, quite different intentions. News is not quite information, and vice versa. A Google News populated by headlines and journalistic imagery is quite different from a Google News populated by headlines and journalistic imagery and also imagery of journalists. And it encourages in consumers a slightly different way of seeing the news itself: not just as a product, but as a product of, you know, someone. As Google put it, cheerily: “We hope you enjoy learning more about the faces behind the news.”

More accurately, of course, they hope you enjoy the Google-ized faces behind the news. Google is expressly not linking to journalists’ Twitter profiles or Facebook pages or personal websites or what have you; it’s linking to their Google+ pages. (And, per changes it made last week to how it displays rel=author markup in regular search returns, it’s publishing journalists’ “in circles” counts — essentially, their Google+ social rank — right on news pages.) On the one hand, that’s what you’d expect — Google Plus, after all — but you could also read the Google News update as yet another move to position Google+ as the social backbone of the web, with journalists as the willing pawns.

Though Google News will be rolling out its reface-ification efforts over the next several weeks — there’s not much evidence of it that I can find at the moment — it’s easy to imagine what the Google News homepage might look like when the rollout’s complete (and fleshed out, ostensibly, by more and more journos jumping on the Google+ bandwagon). It’s easy to imagine a collection of information that blends the news, and the people who produced that news, into one seamless presentation. It’s easy to imagine an environment that encourages consumers to do their consuming with an eye toward those who did the creating — an environment in which stories don’t speak fully for themselves, but also for the people who wrote them. Google, with its wealth of author data, could have easily broken Plus down into different sections, akin to Facebook’s personal Profiles-vs-professional Pages divide. Perhaps that will come later — Google+, and its presence on the Google News page, are still in their infancy — but, as things now stand, yesterday’s tweak seems to suggest yet more infrastructurally enforced blending between journalists’ personal and professional identities.

Again: Largely to the good. Transparency, hooray! Still, there’s something just slightly ominous in all this. Alex Howard summed it up well: When it comes to distribution on Google, he wrote, “media now have a choice before them: join Plus to connect profiles with their stories or stay out of the social fray.”

POSTED     Nov. 3, 2011, 12:30 p.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Newsonomics: BuzzFeed and The New York Times play Facebook’s ubiquity game
The ubiquity game has different rules for digital startups than for legacy businesses. But for both, figuring out the right relationship with Facebook is key to their audience strategies.
Jeff Israely: Good content marketing benefits from a smart publisher’s touch
Our startup correspondent, building Worldcrunch in Paris, on the thinking behind its operation’s pivot: “The smart brands know they’ll lose your attention if they use this new publishing power simply to push their merchandise.”
How a hobby foreign affairs blog became a paywalled news destination — and a business
World Politics Review has grown from one man’s side project to a small news operation supported by a niche paywall.
What to read next
2481
tweets
Millennials say keeping up with the news is important to them — but good luck getting them to pay for it
The new report from the Media Insight Project looks at millennials’ habits and attitudes toward news consumption: “I really wouldn’t pay for any type of news because as a citizen it’s my right to know the news.”
926The next stage in the battle for our attention: Our wrists
News companies have moved from print dollars to digital dimes to mobile pennies. Now, with the highly anticipated launch of the Apple Watch, the screens are getting even smaller. How are smart publishers thinking about the right way to serve users and maintain their attention on smartwatches?
705A wave of distributed content is coming — will publishers sink or swim?
Instead of just publishing to their own websites, news organizations are being asked to publish directly to platforms they don’t control. Is the hunt for readers enough to justify losing some independence?
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
Outside.in
Dallas Morning News
Houston Chronicle
PubliCola
St. Louis Globe-Democrat
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
U.S. News & World Report
Amazon
Hearst
Tucson Citizen
PolitiFact
PBS