Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
The New York Times politics editor is building trust by tweeting context around political stories
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Dec. 3, 2015, 2 p.m.
Reporting & Production

Reporters from digital/niche outlets are replacing daily newspaper reporters in Washington

There are more “digital options for coverage at the national level,” but coverage of the government’s impact on individual communities appears to be decreasing.

Reporters from digital outlets and niche publications now hold more seats in the U.S. Senate Press Gallery than reporters from daily newspapers do, according to a new report from Pew. That’s a change from the late 1990s, when “daily newspaper staff outnumbered such journalists by more than two-to-one.”

As local newspapers shut down and other papers close their Washington bureaus, that means that readers who want “digital options for coverage at the national level” — as well as those who can pay for premium subscription products — might be getting more coverage than they would have in the past, but there’s a “continued strain on Washington reporting for local communities, which focuses on those communities’ elected representatives, interests, and needs,” said Amy Mitchell, Pew’s director of journalism research.

Screen Shot 2015-12-03 at 9.31.47 AM

Pew looked at “coverage of the federal government in eight local newspapers from across the U.S., four with a D.C. reporter and four without,” over four months this past spring, in an attempt to see how “coverage from Washington-based correspondents might differ from coverage coming from newspaper staff not stationed in D.C., wire services or other national media.”

It found that “of all the coverage about federal government appearing in these papers, the portion that comes from D.C.-based reporters accounts for less than 10 percent. Instead, the greatest portion of federal government coverage by far comes from wire service stories.” In addition, these D.C.-based reporters were less likely to focus on various issues’ impact on citizens.

Among Pew’s other findings:

Screen Shot 2015-12-03 at 9.37.36 AM— Journalists from “niche outlets and broad-interest websites” made up 37 percent of the Senate Press Gallery in 2014, a 32 percent increase from 2009.

These broad-interest websites include outlets like The Huffington Post and BuzzFeed; “73 journalists working for such an organization were accredited to the Press Gallery in 2014,” up from just two in 2009.

Sixty journalists working for “niche digital-native sites,” like Kaiser Health News and Inside Higher Ed, were accredited, up from 29 in 2009.

— If you’re wondering where Politico is, its journalists aren’t counted in the Press Gallery, but in the Periodical Gallery:

Politico…more than doubled its accredited Washington staff from 43 to 112 between 2009 and 2014. Talking Points Memo and Townhall — two politics websites with no accredited staff in 2009 — had a combined 19 in 2014. Newer entrants in the past year include Vox Media, which launched Vox.com at its Washington headquarters in 2014.

— “Few of these journalists work for digital-native publications whose mission is to serve a local community,” Pew notes. While sites like The Texas Tribune and MinnPost now have a Washington correspondent, “these amount to a small fraction of the total number of journalists staffing digital news operations more generally, which often focus on national politics rather than the local or regional implications of what happens inside the Beltway.”

— Local newspapers “play an outsized role in delivering news about federal government,” Pew found, largely because they rely heavily on wire services. Mainstream wire service reporters covering Washington made up 12 percent of the Senate Press Gallery in 2014, about the same as in 2009. (The majority of those reporters are from the AP.) This wire service coverage is not local, Pew laments:

What is not clear in the data is the orientation of these journalists — specifically, the extent to which some serve particular states and regions around the country, monitor the committee activities and votes of specific members of Congress, or track the decisions made at specific agencies which might have implications for communities outside the Beltway. The Press Gallery lists include journalists’ names, but not their assignments. Detailed information was not found on the AP’s website. And multiple attempts to obtain information directly from the AP Washington bureau were unsuccessful. There is some suggestion in the content analysis that most are nationally focused, or at least produce nationally oriented coverage, as the vast majority of wire stories carried in the newspapers studied did not contain a local angle.

Image by Andrew Morton used under a Creative Commons license.

POSTED     Dec. 3, 2015, 2 p.m.
SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
SHARE THIS STORY
   
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
The New York Times politics editor is building trust by tweeting context around political stories
“I wanted to start engaging with readers about our intentions behind our stories.”
Here are 12 principles journalists should follow to make sure they’re protecting their sources
“We’re being forced to act like spies, having to learn tradecraft and encryption and all the new ways to protect sources. But we are not an intelligence agency. We’re not really spies. So, there’s going to be a time when you might make a mistake or do something that might not perfectly protect a source.”
Take these email templates and go build a beautiful (monetized, useful, tested, efficient) newsletter
“Who’s your audience? How will you serve that audience? Why do we care about that audience? No, really, what’s the payoff?”