Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Can Canada build its own independent podcast industry in the True North strong and free?
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 28, 2016, 2:05 p.m.
Reporting & Production

ProPublica’s collaborative reporting experiment takes on widespread voter fraud (and finds no evidence of it)

More than 450 reporters from 250 outlets across the country have published over 300 stories as part of the Electionland project.

After president-elect Donald Trump falsely claimed on Twitter Sunday that “millions of people…voted illegally,” costing him the popular vote to Hillary Clinton, ProPublica took to his favorite social media platform to refute the claims.

On Election Day, the nonprofit investigative outlet led Electionland, a coalition of more than 1,100 people that covered voting problems across the country, and in a tweetstorm written by senior reporting fellow Jessica Huseman, ProPublica said it “saw no evidence” that the election was rigged. Here are the first six tweets in a chain of 15:

ProPublica is still tallying the number of stories that originated from Electionland’s reporting (and more stories are still being written) but it said that, so far, it’s found about 300 stories that appeared either in local or national outlets or on Electionland’s own site.

“Donald Trump [said] over the weekend that several million people voted illegally,” ProPublica deputy managing editor Scott Klein said. “We have data that shows it’s simply not true. If anything happened at the scale that he’s implying, we would’ve seen it. We were there. We had a real-time look at the nation and how things were going.”

Though ProPublica spearheaded the effort, six other organizations took part in organizing Electionland. In total, 450 journalists from about 250 news organizations took part in the project.

Using tips and tools from the First Draft Coalition, students from 14 journalism schools scoured social media looking for reports of issues at the polls. Electionland also worked with the Google News Lab to analyze search trends. It had access to reports submitted to Election Protection, an initiative run by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law that lets people report voting problems by phone.

Additionally, WNYC developed a tool that enabled Electionland to interact with voters through SMS text messages to report issues. In total, about 100,000 people received texts from Electionland.

All of the data and reports were then sent out to the local news organizations that participated in Electionland.

The collaboration with local news organizations was critical to Electionland’s success, said Celeste LeCompte, ProPublica’s director of business development and a former Nieman Fellow.

For instance, there was a lot of talk leading up to Election Day about possible voter intimidation in Philadelphia. On Nov. 8, Electionland noticed a spike in search traffic around the topic. While there were some one-off confrontations, they were able to use on-the-ground reporting to determine that there weren’t widespread intimidation issues. The spike, it turned out, was likely from people searching whether there was intimidation going on.

“A lot of the reporters we were working with are familiar with looking at the data in their own jurisdictions,” LeCompte said. “We know what the social media looks like for our area, but having that national context was incredibly helpful for knowing they weren’t missing something. We were there saying, ‘We’re seeing the same thing you are. We’re seeing no more real reports than you might be if you’d spent all day doing this. You’re not seeing something anomalous to the national trend.’”

Electionland’s main newsroom was located at the CUNY Graduate School of Journalism in New York. More than 100 students and journalists worked out of the space.

To communicate with reporters in New York and around the country, Electionland had a dedicated Slack. It also used Landslide, a custom-built dashboard that organized all of the incoming information.

Electionland used the early voting period leading up to Election Day to test its systems out, but Klein said the processes worked smoothly on Election Day itself.

“We expected a lot of improvisation during the day and a lot of big moves,” Klein said. “We had a couple of contingency plans in place for moving people around, in case we had guessed wrong, but it went remarkably smoothly from our vantage point. We proved that social media verification is a potent newsgathering technique that can function at scale.”

ProPublica put together state-by-state background resources that included information such as how elections are run, how many voters are in each county, and problems that were reported in the past. But Klein said that, in retrospect, he and LeCompte would have liked to provide more resources to the participants to prepare them for what they would likely see on Election Day.

“If we had to do it over again, we’d spend some time writing and teaching what we knew after months of reporting on election administration,” he said. “I think that would’ve caused even more stories to be published.”

Klein said ProPublica will continue to cover voting rights issues closely over the coming years of the Trump administration. But the organization is still working out how it could continue to utilize the Electionland infrastructure that it built up.

Regardless of how its voting rights coverage proceeds, Klein and LeCompte said they are thinking about ways ProPublica can pursue other large-scale collaborations.

They are especially interested in ways to pair local and national coverage. That’s something ProPublica already does with its reporting, but LeCompte said they’re already thinking about ways to further their partnerships.

“There are an unlimited number of places where you see really strong overlaps between the ways national stories and local stories are told,” LeCompte said. “Local reporters…know their areas better than we do, but being able to help provide context, time, and resources to help make those local stories part of a larger conversation is so important, and there’s so much potential to do things like this beyond social media projects.”

Photo by Joe Shlabotnik used under a Creative Commons license.

POSTED     Nov. 28, 2016, 2:05 p.m.
SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Can Canada build its own independent podcast industry in the True North strong and free?
Plus: Everybody’s suddenly making podcasts for kids, a show reveals itself as part-fiction in its grand finale, and mixing podcasts and dating apps.
Here are three tools that help digital journalists save their work in case a site shuts down
“So many people who work professionally on the Internet really don’t know, until too late, that their work is this fragile.”
Village Media, relying on local advertisers, seems to have found a scalable (and profitable) local news model
“We have to find new and creative ways to not replace a client’s Google and Facebook spend but find our own portion of it.”