Prediction
Legal rigor meets journalistic inquiry to yield groundbreaking investigations
Name
Basile Simon
Excerpt
“Ethical considerations will be the compass guiding these partnerships, weaving together the principles of truth, accuracy, and public interest from journalism, the expertise of NGOs, and the commitment to fairness and accountability from legal initiatives.”
Prediction ID
426173696c65-24
 

At a dynamic intersection of journalism, OSINT investigations, and legal practice, the future holds a promising trajectory. As witnessed in recent seminars, newsroom initiatives, and insights from figures like Ibrahim Olabi, the concept of mixed-mandate investigations is gaining momentum. This forward momentum is not just buzz; it’s a trend that’s set to reshape the landscape of investigative journalism in 2024.

The coming year will likely witness a deeper integration of these collaborative efforts. Ethical considerations will be the compass guiding these partnerships, weaving together the principles of truth, accuracy, and public interest from journalism, the expertise of NGOs, and the commitment to fairness and accountability from legal initiatives.

Anticipate a wave of groundbreaking investigations in 2024. These endeavors won’t merely expose wrongdoing and inform the public; they will actively contribute to criminal accountability. The recognition of the value in such collaborations is poised to grow within both the public and legal systems.

However, amid this optimism, a significant challenge looms — the clash of practices. It’s not just about the peculiarities of each profession; it’s about the clash of protective instincts. Investigative journalists and OSINT investigators are accustomed to safeguarding their work and independence by keeping it close-knit. The challenge arises in differing perceptions of source protection, confidentiality, objectivity versus advocacy, and standards of proof.

Navigating this clash requires a delicate balance, one that acknowledges the unique needs of both professions while fostering collaboration. The evolving landscape demands a shared understanding and language that respects the independence of each while amplifying the collective impact.

Amidst these challenges, be sure to check out the recent guide on investigating war crimes by the Global Investigative Journalism Network, offering insights into investigating war crimes. The commendable work of the Reckoning Project and initiatives like the Starling Lab and Ron Haviv’s industry-wide push showcase the diverse ways in which collaboration can thrive. As we move into 2024, the blend of journalistic inquiry, expert analysis, and legal rigor promises a new era of investigative endeavors, pushing the boundaries of accountability and societal change.

Janine di Giovanni, executive director and CEO at The Reckoning Project, contributed to this prediction.

Basile Simon is director of special projects at Stanford and USC’s Starling Lab for Data Integrity.

At a dynamic intersection of journalism, OSINT investigations, and legal practice, the future holds a promising trajectory. As witnessed in recent seminars, newsroom initiatives, and insights from figures like Ibrahim Olabi, the concept of mixed-mandate investigations is gaining momentum. This forward momentum is not just buzz; it’s a trend that’s set to reshape the landscape of investigative journalism in 2024.

The coming year will likely witness a deeper integration of these collaborative efforts. Ethical considerations will be the compass guiding these partnerships, weaving together the principles of truth, accuracy, and public interest from journalism, the expertise of NGOs, and the commitment to fairness and accountability from legal initiatives.

Anticipate a wave of groundbreaking investigations in 2024. These endeavors won’t merely expose wrongdoing and inform the public; they will actively contribute to criminal accountability. The recognition of the value in such collaborations is poised to grow within both the public and legal systems.

However, amid this optimism, a significant challenge looms — the clash of practices. It’s not just about the peculiarities of each profession; it’s about the clash of protective instincts. Investigative journalists and OSINT investigators are accustomed to safeguarding their work and independence by keeping it close-knit. The challenge arises in differing perceptions of source protection, confidentiality, objectivity versus advocacy, and standards of proof.

Navigating this clash requires a delicate balance, one that acknowledges the unique needs of both professions while fostering collaboration. The evolving landscape demands a shared understanding and language that respects the independence of each while amplifying the collective impact.

Amidst these challenges, be sure to check out the recent guide on investigating war crimes by the Global Investigative Journalism Network, offering insights into investigating war crimes. The commendable work of the Reckoning Project and initiatives like the Starling Lab and Ron Haviv’s industry-wide push showcase the diverse ways in which collaboration can thrive. As we move into 2024, the blend of journalistic inquiry, expert analysis, and legal rigor promises a new era of investigative endeavors, pushing the boundaries of accountability and societal change.

Janine di Giovanni, executive director and CEO at The Reckoning Project, contributed to this prediction.

Basile Simon is director of special projects at Stanford and USC’s Starling Lab for Data Integrity.