Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“Checking Twitter…while being rushed into a bunker”: Considering fake news and nuclear war
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
June 20, 2016, 2:52 p.m.

The Washington Post is testing out a few new hurdles for non-paying online readers

The Post is now asking readers to submit their email in order to read stories without paying.

Even as it boasts of record traffic, The Washington Post is apparently looking at ways to make it a little more difficult for people to read its journalism for free. Numerous social media users are reporting that the paper is taking steps to get more information about readers, and the paper has taken steps to close loopholes that let readers access stories for free via social media.

Some readers who aren’t logged into the Post’s site are getting a pop up that asks them to provide their email address and subscribe to the the paper’s Post Most daily newsletter.

PostEmail

Some users reported that the offer included six free weeks of access to the Post as well.

(Update: A Post spokeswoman said she wouldn’t be able to provide details about the changes today, but did note that “there has been a change where access to content from social is no longer unlimited.”)

Others were unhappy that the Post was asking for their email address, and some said that they wanted to share their email, but that the system wasn’t working.

When the Post launched its paywall in 2013, it was a little leakier than most, with exceptions for those logging in from schools, government offices, and military installations. Stories accessed through search or social media also didn’t count against the paywall, but the Post has now closed that loophole.

The Post says it had 63 million unique visitors in May, a 32 percent increase from May 2015. (Notably though, after it trumpeted surpassing The New York Times in unique visitors late last year, the Times again overtook the Post with 69 million unique visitors in May.)

Though it highlights the size of its audience, the Post’s moves seem to highlight a continued recognition that news organizations won’t be able to survive on digital advertising alone. And the Post isn’t the only outlet that’s tightened up its paywall. Publishers are looking to squeeze as much money and information as they can out of readers as digital advertising revenue dries up. The annual Pew State of the Media Report, which was released last week, said that five companies — Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft, and Twitter — captured 65 percent of the $59.6 billion spent on digital advertising last year.

Earlier this year, The Wall Street Journal experimented with closing a loophole in its paywall that let readers access stories for free by googling its headline. This spring, The New York Times also began limiting free access from social media.

In 2013, The Boston Globe tightened its paywall, only allowing readers who came in from social two articles per month for free. (In 2014, the Globe dropped its hard paywall and implemented a metered system.) At the time, a Globe spokeswoman said the paper was “trying to find the optimal balance between a free, ad-supported model and a premium, consumer-supported model.”

“This is part of an effort to continually experiment, test and analyze how our readers engage with us digitally,” she said. “We have been trying to find the right balance between the free-sharing culture of the Internet and paid access to premium Globe content. We believe that we can only arrive at that balance through experimentation.”

POSTED     June 20, 2016, 2:52 p.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“Checking Twitter…while being rushed into a bunker”: Considering fake news and nuclear war
Plus: The EU is surveying its citizens on fake news; what CrossCheck learned in France; the upcoming Disinformation Action Lab.
Can Canada build its own independent podcast industry in the True North strong and free?
Plus: Everybody’s suddenly making podcasts for kids, a show reveals itself as part-fiction in its grand finale, and mixing podcasts and dating apps.
Here are three tools that help digital journalists save their work in case a site shuts down
“So many people who work professionally on the Internet really don’t know, until too late, that their work is this fragile.”