This interview is part of an occasional series of Q&As with people who are the first to hold their title in their news (or, in this case, news-adjacent) organization. Read through the rest here.
There’s been a spike in legislation that could impact local news outlets in recent years. Some proposals have aimed to unlock funding for the struggling local news industry through tax credits, ad spending, fellowships, or other means. Others have sought to codify legal protections for journalists.
And there’s more to come. Some estimates indicate 25 different states will introduce legislation relevant to local news in 2025. Determined not to let newsrooms get caught on their back foot, Local Independent Online News (LION) Publishers announced last year it would hire a full-time policy person to take “a proactive role” on behalf of its hundreds of member newsrooms.
Chuck Corra, “a veteran of policy and advocacy campaigns in multiple states,” has joined LION as its first-ever associate director of policy and advocacy, the organization announced last month. Previously, Corra worked on campaigns for renewable energy developers and a civics education nonprofit, among others. He describes himself as a “West Virginia native, former Tennessean, [and] current Florida Man.”
Here at Nieman Lab, we have noted what feels to us like a shift — within the news industry — toward being more open to public funding, especially for a struggling local news sector. That’s not to say publishers and journalists have dismissed all of their concerns, which include constitutional questions and government influence. But it seems more and more agree that “the market alone can’t and won’t provide the public good that is local news,” as then Texas Tribune editor-in-chief Sewell Chan wrote in a clear-eyed essay last year. “The stakes are too high for practitioners to sit these debates out.”
LION executive director Chris Krewson said that one segment of LION’s membership, in particular, has been uneasy about adopting a more active role.
“If our experience in California is any guide, the bigger hurdle will be activating nonprofit publishers. Those are a little less than half our membership, but are larger, budget- and staff-wise, than smaller for-profit publishers,” Krewson said. “They’re also keenly aware that there are limits to how much ‘lobbying’ those can do. I have spoken with nonprofit leaders who were hesitant to lend their weight to a proposal because they didn’t want to endanger their nonprofit status. So it’s going to be a process of educating them about the possible, and encouraging them to speak up for their businesses in ways that are compliant — but effective.”
LION has been careful about its own headcount, particularly as news support organizations (or intermediaries) are scrutinized for growing as many local newsrooms struggle to keep the lights on. Sarah Gustavus Lim, director of membership at LION, said that though Krewson had taken on advocacy work in the past, the sheer volume of new and proposed legislation made it clear LION needed a dedicated policy person.
LION’s membership ranges from one-person newsrooms to sites with revenue in the millions. But, as Gustavus Lim noted, the majority of LION members are on the smaller side and work with budgets under $500,000.
“Our members asked for LION to be more proactive, not just playing defense when we become aware of policies that could negatively impact them,” Gustavus Lim said. “We’ve seen many times in the past that if LION and our members are not represented, bills can be written in ways that exclude independent digital publishers.“
In a media lobbying landscape LION sees as dominated by “large hedge fund backed newspapers that have not adapted to a digital ecosystem,” the organization has framed this new policy position as, in part, a necessary counterweight that will champion digital news outlets’ interests. Krewson has said these lobbying interests can block digital-only publishers from revenue-generating programs such as “public notices, legal ads, state ad buys, and the rest.”“We think a key benefit of LION membership will be a heads-up early in the process, and updates if and when [legislation] moves forward, with ways for publishers to get involved along the way,” Krewson said.
Membership dues make up only 2 percent of LION’s earned revenue and the organization relies on foundation grants and tech company contracts to fund much of its work. Krewson said the timing for the first-ever policy role was determined not just by finding the money — but the right money. LION has partnered with Facebook and Google but could not, for obvious reasons, rely on Big Tech dollars for this role. (Both companies have been targeted by legislative efforts to boost journalism.) Multi-year funding for the full-time policy position will come primarily from the American Journalism Project, with some additional funding from a recent MacArthur grant.
Nieman Lab asked Corra about how the 2024 election may affect public funding for journalism, expanding the coalition to include groups that support small businesses and entrepreneurs, and ensuring small and digital-only newsrooms get a piece of the public funding pie. Our conversation, lightly edited for length and clarity, is below.
I’ll also work closely with partner organizations and coalitions on policy that we determine is of importance to our membership and educate/inform lawmakers and partner organizations of how different policy will impact local independent online newsrooms. Additionally, I will work to develop a regular communication cadence with our membership to keep them informed of the changing policy landscape, how it will impact them, and what they can do to get involved in shaping the outcome.
Who am I missing? What will collaboration look like? Could you give us a couple of specific examples of complementary policy goals?
To the question of what collaboration looks like: advocacy work is often accomplished by group effort. Most of the important work is done through coalitions and collective action, so my hope is to have LION take an active role in coalitions where we find alignment and have our policy priorities be a part of those efforts.
Beyond this, my professional background includes policy, public affairs, and grassroots advocacy work spanning across issue areas including immigration reform, renewable energy, climate resiliency, and civics education advocacy. I’m from Appalachia and have worked primarily in Tennessee and other southern states.
And, specifically, how much of a policy priority is legal protection for newsrooms in the context of a rise in SLAPP lawsuits? Are there specific protections you think are realistic and worth pursuing?
The rise in SLAPP lawsuits is very concerning. I’m hesitant to opine on what’s realistic legislatively at this point, however I think anything that strengthens protections for newsrooms is worth at least looking into and dedicating some time to pursuing.
How will you approach the challenge of advocating for all LION members?
In fact, maybe that’s part of the answer – that you and LION will be specifically well-equipped to guide nonprofit members precisely because LION is complying with the same restrictions in its own activity.
Is it your sense that LION members are starting from the premise that there is a need for, essentially, a LION lobbyist to advocate for policies that support all members — or do you think you’ll have to win some members over who might harbor hesitation about getting involved in policy sausage-making?
I don’t expect to be given the trust and support of our members without earning it, so my goal is to demonstrate to members the importance of having LION represented in these important policy matters that are already taking place. If policy is being crafted that impacts our members, I think it’s important that we are making efforts to help shape it to their benefit. The sausage-making is going to happen whether we choose to be a part of it or not.
I am grateful for the opportunity because it means I can shape this role in my vision and leverage my experience and creativity to create something really unique and impactful. The local independent news industry needs strong advocates in spaces that they have not traditionally had, so the opportunity to be a creative advocate in that space is really exciting to me.