Do comment sections build a bias against expertise? Do people remember Facebook posts? How much does news drive search, and vice versa? These are some of the most noteworthy findings in academic research in 2013.
Moving from swing states to swing individuals, how your CMS affects your journalism, and the efficacy of digital activism: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Gendered sourcing on Twitter and the allure of following the crowd." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 27 Nov. 2013. Web. 26 Apr. 2024.
APA
Wihbey, J. (2013, Nov. 27). What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Gendered sourcing on Twitter and the allure of following the crowd. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved April 26, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/11/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-gendered-sourcing-on-twitter-and-the-allure-of-following-the-crowd/
Chicago
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Gendered sourcing on Twitter and the allure of following the crowd." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified November 27, 2013. Accessed April 26, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/11/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-gendered-sourcing-on-twitter-and-the-allure-of-following-the-crowd/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/11/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-gendered-sourcing-on-twitter-and-the-allure-of-following-the-crowd/
| title = What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Gendered sourcing on Twitter and the allure of following the crowd
| last = Wihbey
| first = John
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 27 November 2013
| accessdate = 26 April 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Wihbey|2013}}
}}
