The module formerly known as Watching is linking out less than it used to, but the Times says it still believes in curating the work of other news organizations.
Can publishers find a sustainable business model this new age of Facebook/Apple/Snapchat/Twitter/Google distributed content? And is local news destined to be left behind?
Whether they’d do it out of benevolence, fear of regulators, or the quest for a competitive advantage, Google could be of real service to the news industry and the broader cause of journalism. Here’s how.
“Meduza was never meant to be opposed to anything. We are strictly pro-common sense. Unfortunately, it’s no longer possible to maintain that in Russia anymore, and this is why we had to leave.”
News on digital platforms may feel like a revolution, but a lot of the underlying behaviors — by readers and by publishers — date back to an earlier era.
Doctor, Ken. "The newsonomics of mixing old and new." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 5 Feb. 2015. Web. 10 Apr. 2024.
APA
Doctor, K. (2015, Feb. 5). The newsonomics of mixing old and new. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved April 10, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/02/the-newsonomics-of-mixing-old-and-new/
Chicago
Doctor, Ken. "The newsonomics of mixing old and new." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified February 5, 2015. Accessed April 10, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/02/the-newsonomics-of-mixing-old-and-new/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/02/the-newsonomics-of-mixing-old-and-new/
| title = The newsonomics of mixing old and new
| last = Doctor
| first = Ken
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 5 February 2015
| accessdate = 10 April 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Doctor|2015}}
}}
