For the better part of this year, news organizations in the Climate Publishers Network have been republishing each other’s climate change stories in order to expand their coverage of the issue.
This new study uses old data, but it gives at least some hope that comment sections might not always be as awful as the reporters writing the stories above them think.
When NGOs act like news organizations, narratives of the Arab Spring, and predicting who you are from what you “like”: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Arianna Huffington explains why her site takes an editorial stance: “Because we are clear about where we believe the truth lies, I believe we elicit a richer kind of response from our readers.” Justin Ellis
Ellis, Justin. "Why the Huffington Post doesn’t equivocate on issues like global warming." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 16 Apr. 2012. Web. 27 Feb. 2020.
APA
Ellis, J. (2012, Apr. 16). Why the Huffington Post doesn’t equivocate on issues like global warming. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved February 27, 2020, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/04/why-the-huffington-post-doesnt-equivocate-on-issues-like-global-warming/
Chicago
Ellis, Justin. "Why the Huffington Post doesn’t equivocate on issues like global warming." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified April 16, 2012. Accessed February 27, 2020. https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/04/why-the-huffington-post-doesnt-equivocate-on-issues-like-global-warming/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/04/why-the-huffington-post-doesnt-equivocate-on-issues-like-global-warming/
| title = Why the Huffington Post doesn’t equivocate on issues like global warming
| last = Ellis
| first = Justin
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 16 April 2012
| accessdate = 27 February 2020
| ref = {{harvid|Ellis|2012}}
}}
