Plus: The Manti Te’o hoax, The Atlantic’s botched Scientology advertorial, a check on CNET’s editorial independence, and the rest of the week’s media/tech news.
Slocum, Mac. "CNET and Gizmodo are sharing content, and they don’t seem worried about a “duplicate penalty”." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 2 Feb. 2010. Web. 17 Apr. 2024.
APA
Slocum, M. (2010, Feb. 2). CNET and Gizmodo are sharing content, and they don’t seem worried about a “duplicate penalty”. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved April 17, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/cnet-and-gizmodo-are-sharing-content-and-they-dont-seem-worried-about-a-duplicate-penalty/
Chicago
Slocum, Mac. "CNET and Gizmodo are sharing content, and they don’t seem worried about a “duplicate penalty”." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified February 2, 2010. Accessed April 17, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/cnet-and-gizmodo-are-sharing-content-and-they-dont-seem-worried-about-a-duplicate-penalty/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2010/02/cnet-and-gizmodo-are-sharing-content-and-they-dont-seem-worried-about-a-duplicate-penalty/
| title = CNET and Gizmodo are sharing content, and they don’t seem worried about a “duplicate penalty”
| last = Slocum
| first = Mac
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 2 February 2010
| accessdate = 17 April 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Slocum|2010}}
}}
