Journalist’s Resource sifts through the academic journals so you don’t have to. Here are what they consider 10 of the most important pieces of new research into digital and social media published in 2017.
“Nostalgia provides reassurance and self-gratification, but it is also intellectually and socially stultifying. It is time to move on, make sense of the present by learning from history, not by clinging to it, in order to help shape more productive futures.”
“La nostalgia, tanto en el periodismo como en la academia, no es productiva; el presente está maduro para reflexionar sobre el pasado como una vía para imaginar nuevos futuros”.
When journalists factcheck politicians (or don’t), how to flag bad behavior on social media, and getting past slactivism: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Predicting what goes viral, sourcing the Arab Spring, and Twitter in power vs. out of power: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Moving from swing states to swing individuals, how your CMS affects your journalism, and the efficacy of digital activism: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
How men and women interact differently on Twitter, new books on digital politics, and China’s “human flesh search engine”: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
The arguments for smarter public support of journalism, the rise of civic engagement in social media, and the changing practices of foreign correspondents: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 25 Apr. 2013. Web. 24 Jul. 2024.
APA
Wihbey, J. (2013, Apr. 25). What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved July 24, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/04/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-why-journalists-link-or-why-they-dont-and-the-libel-potential-of-a-retweet/
Chicago
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified April 25, 2013. Accessed July 24, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/04/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-why-journalists-link-or-why-they-dont-and-the-libel-potential-of-a-retweet/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/04/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-why-journalists-link-or-why-they-dont-and-the-libel-potential-of-a-retweet/
| title = What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet
| last = Wihbey
| first = John
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 25 April 2013
| accessdate = 24 July 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Wihbey|2013}}
}}
