Including better support for paywalled sites, richer ad formats, and ways for publishers to direct readers elsewhere on their site from within an AMP article.
Only a small subset of news organizations currently use HTTPS to secure their connections to readers, but a variety of incentives — from Google’s search rules to browser makers’ policies — are pushing them in that direction.
What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
Wang, Shan. "S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 13 Jul. 2015. Web. 3 Oct. 2024.
APA
Wang, S. (2015, Jul. 13). S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved October 3, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/07/s-is-for-secure-why-news-organizations-are-ditching-or-should-ditch-http-for-https/
Chicago
Wang, Shan. "S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified July 13, 2015. Accessed October 3, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/07/s-is-for-secure-why-news-organizations-are-ditching-or-should-ditch-http-for-https/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2015/07/s-is-for-secure-why-news-organizations-are-ditching-or-should-ditch-http-for-https/
| title = S is for “secure”: Why news organizations are ditching (or should ditch) HTTP for HTTPS
| last = Wang
| first = Shan
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 13 July 2015
| accessdate = 3 October 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Wang|2015}}
}}
