“In an era in which trust in news is fractured and employment is precarious, we need to look more closely at the ways that journalists’ sense of their own professional value — or lack thereof — influences the work they do and the environment in which they do it.”
We sift through the academic journals so you don’t have to. Here are 10 of the most interesting studies about social and digital media published in 2015.
In a new book, a group of academics look at how the big defining questions of the field — what is journalism? who is a journalist? who decides? — are changing.
When journalists factcheck politicians (or don’t), how to flag bad behavior on social media, and getting past slactivism: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Vigorous linking as an antidote to newspaper failure, who gets crowdfunded, and skepticism around the standard narrative of the Arab Spring: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
What was once the Online Journalism Review — for a time, maybe the finest website covering Internet journalism — is now a skeezy ad for an Australian startup. Caveat lector — especially when Comic Sans is involved.
How men and women interact differently on Twitter, new books on digital politics, and China’s “human flesh search engine”: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
The arguments for smarter public support of journalism, the rise of civic engagement in social media, and the changing practices of foreign correspondents: all that and more in this month’s roundup of the academic literature.
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 25 Apr. 2013. Web. 20 Jan. 2021.
APA
Wihbey, J. (2013, Apr. 25). What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/04/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-why-journalists-link-or-why-they-dont-and-the-libel-potential-of-a-retweet/
Chicago
Wihbey, John. "What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified April 25, 2013. Accessed January 20, 2021. https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/04/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-why-journalists-link-or-why-they-dont-and-the-libel-potential-of-a-retweet/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2013/04/whats-new-in-digital-scholarship-why-journalists-link-or-why-they-dont-and-the-libel-potential-of-a-retweet/
| title = What’s New in Digital Scholarship: Why journalists link (or why they don’t) and the libel potential of a retweet
| last = Wihbey
| first = John
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 25 April 2013
| accessdate = 20 January 2021
| ref = {{harvid|Wihbey|2013}}
}}