Slow news has been pitched as a way to break through the noise and reach audiences exhausted by the daily headlines. But it’s still fast-news junkies who are most attracted to it, this new research finds.
Forty-two percent of Democrats say the news they get on social media has helped their understanding of current events, compared to 24 percent of Republicans who say the same thing.
Ellis, Justin. "The unfaithful audience: How topics, devices, and urgency affect the way we get our news." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 18 Mar. 2014. Web. 2 Dec. 2021.
APA
Ellis, J. (2014, Mar. 18). The unfaithful audience: How topics, devices, and urgency affect the way we get our news. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved December 2, 2021, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/03/the-unfaithful-audience-how-topics-devices-and-urgency-affect-the-way-we-get-our-news/
Chicago
Ellis, Justin. "The unfaithful audience: How topics, devices, and urgency affect the way we get our news." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified March 18, 2014. Accessed December 2, 2021. https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/03/the-unfaithful-audience-how-topics-devices-and-urgency-affect-the-way-we-get-our-news/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2014/03/the-unfaithful-audience-how-topics-devices-and-urgency-affect-the-way-we-get-our-news/
| title = The unfaithful audience: How topics, devices, and urgency affect the way we get our news
| last = Ellis
| first = Justin
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 18 March 2014
| accessdate = 2 December 2021
| ref = {{harvid|Ellis|2014}}
}}
