News Corp’s painfully named news aggregator promised to somehow battle “crass clickbait,” filter bubbles, media bias, and two trillion-dollar companies, all at once. It ended up being a D-minus Drudge clone and OnlyFans blog.
“Does satire have a liberal bias? Sure. Satire has a liberal psychological bias. But the only person who can successfully harness the power of satire is the satirist. Not political strategists. Not a political party. Not a presidential candidate.”
Even without the L.A. Times, it still controls a lot of important newspapers. Will it sell them to Gannett, Murdoch, local individuals in each city — or to yet another private equity firm looking to strip papers for parts?
First Sinclair and now the Kochs are back. In an age of media free-for-all and massive deregulation, will fact-based journalism become an endangered species?
Doctor, Ken. "Newsonomics: The 2016 media year by the numbers, and a look toward 2017." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 19 Dec. 2016. Web. 3 Oct. 2024.
APA
Doctor, K. (2016, Dec. 19). Newsonomics: The 2016 media year by the numbers, and a look toward 2017. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved October 3, 2024, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/12/newsonomics-the-2016-media-year-by-the-numbers-and-a-look-toward-2017/
Chicago
Doctor, Ken. "Newsonomics: The 2016 media year by the numbers, and a look toward 2017." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified December 19, 2016. Accessed October 3, 2024. https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/12/newsonomics-the-2016-media-year-by-the-numbers-and-a-look-toward-2017/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2016/12/newsonomics-the-2016-media-year-by-the-numbers-and-a-look-toward-2017/
| title = Newsonomics: The 2016 media year by the numbers, and a look toward 2017
| last = Doctor
| first = Ken
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 19 December 2016
| accessdate = 3 October 2024
| ref = {{harvid|Doctor|2016}}
}}