“It’s about cutting through the apathy that a lot of people have about tech because it feels mysterious, letting people know there are decisions and changes you can make to your behavior that will feel empowering to people.”
Two companies with similar editorial values and brands that mostly complement instead of overlap. This is the kind of smart merger we should see more of.
Sarah Kliff has brought her healthcare billing projects from Vox to The New York Times, reporting on the submissions of thousands of readers. And now she’s written for an audience of practitioners and academics.
“I’m sure everybody in the industry would [agree] that YouTube can be a messy, nasty place. The membership is just this delightful two-way conversation, with people who are really there to support Vox.”
“It came out of a sense that there were some really important topics with impacts on human beings that didn’t get as much coverage in traditional journalism sections and pieces.”
Schmidt, Christine. "Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 15 Oct. 2018. Web. 16 Jan. 2021.
APA
Schmidt, C. (2018, Oct. 15). Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved January 16, 2021, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/10/will-voxs-new-section-on-effective-altruism-well-do-any-good/
Chicago
Schmidt, Christine. "Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified October 15, 2018. Accessed January 16, 2021. https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/10/will-voxs-new-section-on-effective-altruism-well-do-any-good/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/10/will-voxs-new-section-on-effective-altruism-well-do-any-good/
| title = Will Vox’s new section on effective altruism…well, do any good?
| last = Schmidt
| first = Christine
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 15 October 2018
| accessdate = 16 January 2021
| ref = {{harvid|Schmidt|2018}}
}}
