Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
June 28, 2018, 1:19 p.m.
Reporting & Production

Ten newsrooms, 4 countries, thousands of kids: ProPublica launches a project to find immigrant children

“This is the beginning of the reporting on this for our newsroom. We are being transparent about what we know and what we don’t know and what we need help with.”

When the government has thousands of noncitizen children somewhere in its custody, how do you find them? You report on it — together.

Eight — make that nine, and now ten— news organizations are working together across four countries, trying to determine where these children have been taken and, exactly, how many there are. “Help us make sure that every single child is accounted for,” The Intercept’s explanation of the project to readers says.

ProPublica, BuzzFeed News, Univision News, The Intercept, Frontline, the Texas Tribune, Animal Político (in Mexico), El Faro (in El Salvador), and Plaza Pública and El Periódico (both in Guatemala) are involved in the major initiative. They’re seeking information from their readers on the facilities where these children are housed — with check boxes for “I was held there,” “I worked or currently work here,” and more — and who the children are — “What is the child or children’s name (s)? What age(s)?” — in forms available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.

This particular project began with ProPublica publishing a map of all known facilities housing immigrant children — children separated from their parents at the border, and minors who crossed the bordered unaccompanied — to help readers understand their actual proximity to the issue and to hold accountable the government agencies that are involved.

“It was one of those quintessential ProPublica moments. We came together [a week ago] and said, ‘Okay, we’re going to refocus what we’re doing and continue to chase this story of zero tolerance,'” said Adriana Gallardo, engagement reporter at ProPublica.

This is the most quickly that ProPublica has spun up a major collaborative project like this; while the organization has done international collaborations before, this is also the first time it’s embedded a map and engagement questionnaires simultaneously in multiple countries.

Gallardo said ProPublica is maintaining the data and sharing relevant tips with the partners, who are free to pursue stories at their will and are committed to sharing the map and the forms with their audiences. A dozen people from the ProPublica newsroom, among the news apps, research, and engagement teams, are focusing on this project. “As we get more tips, there will be more reporters involved to produce journalism from this, which is the ultimate goal,” Gallardo said.

News organizations have been covering the crisis, which has echoes in the Obama administration and has worsened and gained public attention since the Trump administration began separating children from their parents at the border. ProPublica’s obtained recording of crying young children in one of the shelters drew even more attention. The Texas Tribune added 78 tweets over nine days to its thread tracking the situation started the afternoon of that same day. With that has come critiques of the media coverage, from Time magazine’s cover photo of Trump and the Honduran girl (who wasn’t actually separated from her mother) to the diversity of weekend political talk show guestsleaving out the voices of the people actually involved. Meanwhile, a Facebook fundraiser to raise money to help separated immigrant families went viral and has now surpassed $20 million (from an original $1,500 goal).

Now, these news organizations are digging in to do something more about it.

Gallardo said that most of the tips coming in so far (in the one day that the forms and the map have been live) are related to the facilities rather than the children themselves, but she’s optimistic the international collaborators and other partners will help spread the word. “This is the beginning of the reporting on this for our newsroom,” she said. “We are being transparent about what we know and what we don’t know and what we need help with.”

“Our readers are very enthusiastic about the possibility of helping spread the reach of the map, particularly because our government’s reaction to the crisis has been very shy, clumsy and yielding toward the U.S. government,” said Enrique Naveda, the editor at Plaza Pública, which has partnered before with international coalitions like ICIJ. “Our highest expectation regarding this alliance is to offer a service to migrants above all, and secondly, to have a direct political impact that gives way to more humane policy in the U.S. and Central America.”

ProPublica spearheaded another major collaborative project during 2016’s Election Day, called Electionland, though they obviously had more time to prepare for that newsy situation. Then, 450 journalists from about 250 news outlets in 47 states (and the District of Columbia) monitored voting aberrations, but they had months to prepare for it. ProPublica is also working on Documenting Hate, a nationwide effort to track hate crimes, with partners like Univision, the New York Times’ opinion section, Meedan, PBS NewsHour, and many more, including local outlets.

At Poynter, David Beard pointed out that other news orgs like the Texas Tribune and the Washington Post are trying to crowdsource information on the issue, too, as well as a group of researchers using library science.

POSTED     June 28, 2018, 1:19 p.m.
SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
SHARE THIS STORY
   
 
Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Facebook’s attempts to fight fake news seem to be working. (Twitter’s? Not so much.)
Plus: How YouTubers spread far-right beliefs (don’t just blame algorithms), and another cry for less both-sides journalism.
Public or closed? How much activity really exists? See how other news organizations’ Facebook Groups are faring
We analyzed the data of groups as large as 40,000 members and as small as 300, from international organizations to local publishers. How does yours fit in?
Here’s what the Financial Times is doing to get bossy man voice out of (okay, less prominent in) its opinion section
“She wrote a fabulous piece that did incredibly well and I think there’s no way on earth that (a) she would have submitted or (b) it would have run, before we started this stuff. It got more than double the usual number of pageviews for an opinion piece.”