Nieman Foundation at Harvard
How a titan of 20th-century journalism transformed the AP — and the news
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Oct. 29, 2008, 1:54 p.m.

Take off the PDF training wheels

After thinking about the Christian Science Monitor’s plan, the most puzzling part is the (non-free, price TBA) daily PDF edition, delivered over email. PDF editions have always felt to me like a poorly reasoned set of training wheels for the transition online. They look like familiar print editions, and they speak the same design language, so they add a degree of comfort to editors and publishers moving away from dead trees. But I don’t know of a single successful example anywhere of a PDF-based subscription news product succeeding. PDFs are great for printing but awkward for onscreen reading.

And people don’t print them. As Joel Kramer put it when canceled their PDF edition in July:

Beginning today, we’re dropping the MinnPost in Print feature. Readers will continue to be able to print stories from the site. But as more and more of you are reading MinnPost online, we found too few readers were using MinnPost in Print to justify continuing putting together a printable summary of the site.

A straightforward email newsletter with links back to pages on makes a lot more sense to me. Presumably the Monitor is betting their older readers will print out the PDF each morning, but won’t even they eventually figure out they can just go to the web site and see the same stories for free?

One other point. I see some, like the very sharp Rick Edmonds, comparing the Monitor’s model to Politico, which also prints a paper edition (three times a week in their case) to go along with their web site. Rick refers to the print edition in this model as a “supplement” and a “residual” product.

But it’s important to note that, in Politico’s case, print is not the supplement, financially — it’s the main moneymaker. As Jim VandeHei told AJR a while back, a full 60 percent of Politico’s revenues come from their 27,000-circ thrice-weekly newspaper. That means only 40 percent of their revenues are derived from their huge online audience (3.5 million unique visitors in May, no doubt much higher now).

Do the math: In revenue terms, that means a print reader is worth about 200 times what a unique visitor is online. Print is by no means residual in these models; it’s still the chief revenue source.

POSTED     Oct. 29, 2008, 1:54 p.m.
Show tags
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
How a titan of 20th-century journalism transformed the AP — and the news
“If one man fails to file a story of a millionairess marrying a poor factory hand because that man understands such a story is not properly A.P. stuff, such an error of news judgment ought to be generally made known to other employees.”
The New York Times launches a free, geo-targeted extreme weather newsletter
Readers can opt in to receive morning emails explaining the level and type of extreme weather risk in up to four different places. The newsletter is free for everyone, not just subscribers.
Gannett journalists across the U.S. will strike on June 5
Gannett has around 200 newsrooms, and editorial employees at around two dozen of those will go on strike.