Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Drawing on ten years of expertise, the Texas Tribune wants to coach you on its money-making lessons
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 7, 2008, 4:53 p.m.

An opponent of newsroom cuts gets…cut

Mark Fitzgerald and Jennifer Saba of Editor & Publisher report that Goldman Sachs has laid off its media analyst, Peter Appert, as part of a 10% reduction in staff at the still-standing investment bank. That’s a shame, because Appert was among the few analysts who consistently criticized media companies for destroying their product by firing journalists. In the latest issue of our sister publication Nieman Reports, editor Melissa Ludtke highlighted a pressing question that Appert posed to the chief executive of A. H. Belo: “How do you maintain editorial relevance and quality as you are doing such dramatic cuts in staff?” And last month, Appert made this observation to The New York Times:

It just seems impossible to me that you’re cutting costs dramatically without having some impact on the editorial quality of your product. I can’t prove that this is driving circulation [down], but it’s certainly something that if I were a newspaper publisher would keep me up at night.

Appert has also been cautiously optimistic, if realistic, about the long-term prospects for print journalism, foreseeing “a glimmer of light at the end of the long transition tunnel.” Here’s what he wrote in a research note to investors last month:

Newspaper companies are NOT going out of business (although highly leveraged companies will face particularly acute challenges). Ultimately, we believe newspapers will re-emerge as healthy and dominant players in the local media marketplace as their business models evolve into a hybrid print and online offering. Margins, however, will be significantly below the 20%+ levels historically achieved, and it will likely take another five years before online revenues are sufficiently large to offset secular declines in the print business.

In July, Appert told Reuters: “If I covered only the newspaper industry, first of all I would have been fired a long time ago; secondly, I would have had to kill myself.” Now that Goldman has let him go, a smart media company would be wise to hire him as a consultant.

POSTED     Nov. 7, 2008, 4:53 p.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Drawing on ten years of expertise, the Texas Tribune wants to coach you on its money-making lessons
“People just want to learn a playbook. At the high level, it’s motivational, but at the grassroots level, it’s answering what do your proposals look like, what does your budget look like, how are you talking to donors and members.”
Why liberal satire and conservative outrage are both responses to mainstream media — but with very different powers
“Does satire have a liberal bias? Sure. Satire has a liberal psychological bias. But the only person who can successfully harness the power of satire is the satirist. Not political strategists. Not a political party. Not a presidential candidate.”
$400 a year too steep for you? The Information will now sell mere mortals an app for $30 a year
The app is for “consumers who want to be plugged into the big tech stories without searching through Twitter or watered-down general news sites.”