Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Here’s what ProPublica learned about managing a collaboration across hundreds of news organizations
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 20, 2009, 6:04 p.m.

22% of Pulitzer entries had online content, including 7 winners

Since organizers of the Pulitzer Prizes announced in 2006 they would allow the submission of online content in all journalism categories, newspapers have gotten better at integrating their printed and online materials, prize administrator Sig Gissler said.

This was the first Pulitzer cycle to welcome applications from certain online-only news organizations. But ironically, the 65 entries from 37 online-only news operations looked an awful lot like those of their print brethren. About three-quarters of their applications were made up entirely of traditional entry fodder — text and pictures — rather than online specialties like video, audio, or interactive multimedia.

That’s not that far ahead of the diversity in formats that newspapers were producing. In all, of 1,028 total entries this year, about 22 percent included online content in their submission — compared to 15 to 18 percent last year. Gissler noted a “much better blending” of print and online components than in recent years.

“A few years ago, an entry might have been a story with this digital glob on the bottom,” Gissler said. The online submissions varied in presentation, he said, ranging from printouts of web pages during breaking news events, to DVDs or CDs with video content, to links to still-online resources.

Forty-three percent of entries in the public service category contained some online content; the number was 17 percent in the local reporting category.

Gissler also noted that seven of the winners included online content as part of their applications: public service, breaking news, investigative reporting, local reporting, national reporting, news photography, and feature photography.

“Online material is one of multiple factors,” Gissler said. “But the primary factor remains excellent reporting and writing.”

POSTED     April 20, 2009, 6:04 p.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Here’s what ProPublica learned about managing a collaboration across hundreds of news organizations
“Since the project began in 2017, we received more than 6,000 submissions, gathered hundreds of public records on hate crimes, and published more than 230 stories.”
People who are given correct information still misremember it to fit their own beliefs
Plus: “There is no bygone era of a well-informed, attentive public. What we have had in lieu of a well-informed citizenry is what might be termed a ‘load-bearing’ myth — the myth of the attentive public.”
This is how Report for America ended up funding a community Wikipedia editor (!) at a library (!!)
“Do something different and do it together.”