Charging for content online so people won’t read it

By Zachary M. Seward @zseward May 13, 2009, 3:04 p.m.

There’s lots of chatter about MediaNews Group’s plan to charge for some content online. Details still TK, but this is important: MediaNews president Jody Lodovic doesn’t expect the pay wall to generate significant income.

Lodovic told Editor & Publisher’s Jennifer Saba, “The whole idea is to stop the erosion from print to online and encourage people to become print subscribers.” It’s less a revenue stream than a loss dam — and for a company with 54 daily newspapers that make nearly all of their money in print, it makes some sense. In any event, it’s a new way to think about pay walls.

POSTED May 13, 2009, 3:04 p.m.

Show tags

TWITTER FACEBOOK EMAIL

Peter Martin

Would you pay to be able to quit TikTok and Instagram? You’d be surprised how many would

“The relationship he has uncovered is more like the co-dependence seen in a destructive relationship, or the way we relate to addictive products such as tobacco that we know are doing us harm.”

Joshua Benton

BREAKING: The ways people hear about big news these days; “into a million pieces,” says source

The New York Times and the Washington Post compete with meme accounts for the chance to be first with a big headline.

Julia Barton

In 1924, a magazine ran a contest: “Who is to pay for broadcasting and how?” A century later, we’re still asking the same question

Radio Broadcast received close to a thousand entries to its contest — but ultimately rejected them all.