Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Tell-all crime reporting is a peculiarly American practice. Now U.S. news outlets are rethinking it
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
May 30, 2009, 11:23 a.m.

It’s not the price — it’s the wall that hurts

Scott Rosenberg clarifies an earlier post and, in the process, makes an important point about why so many are wary of The Wall:

“When we talk about “charging for articles” we sometimes mix up the impact of charging itself and the impact of the steps taken to make sure people pay. …

“The problem is that the steps publishers take to maximize revenue end up minimizing the value and utility of their Web pages. Building a “pay wall” typically means that only a paying subscriber can access the page — that’s why it’s a wall. So others can’t link directly to it, and the article is unlikely to serve as the starting point for a wider conversation beyond the now-narrowed pool of subscribers.

“In other words, when you put up a pay wall around a website you are asking people to pay more for access to material that you are simultaneously devaluing by cordoning it off from the rest of the Web.”

The full post is here.

POSTED     May 30, 2009, 11:23 a.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Tell-all crime reporting is a peculiarly American practice. Now U.S. news outlets are rethinking it
U.S. newsrooms are increasingly embracing a bit of the empathy toward wrongdoers shown by reporters in some European countries.
How do you write about traumatic situations without retraumatizing those involved? Read this new guide for journalists, for starters
And what does “retraumatizing” mean, anyway? You won’t get PTSD reading this story, because when you’re done, you’ll know that’s a really inappropriate use of “PTSD.”
“We disagree on what the space should be”: Editors discuss the future of comment sections
What’s the purpose of a comment section?