Nieman Foundation at Harvard
What do we want? Unbiased reporting! When do we want it? During protests!
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 19, 2010, 6 p.m.

Links on Twitter: Guardian crowdsources analysis, AOL’s new strategy and advertising and lowering barriers to publishing with Twitter

FUEGO: Harvard vs. Yale! FRIO: A vuvuzela ban at "The Game" #BeatYale (apologies @TBD) »

Canada’s National Post: "Twitter is basically an extension of our newsroom." »

Apparently we need to invest in drone choppers. They may be the future of journalism »

What @ev meant: Twitter "lowers the barriers to publishing almost as far as they can go." »

The Australian says "maybe not" to Times UK online pay model, "maybe yes" to WSJ approach »

They spent $9 billion and it didn’t work. AOL’s Armstrong on their new plans for content and advertising »

How did Mail Online become one of the most viewed news sites in the world? Editor credits Twitter & Facebook »

News Corp’s The Daily (on iPad) will have a "tabloid sensibility with a broadsheet intelligence." For $0.99/week »

With the biggest set of data on British government spending the Guardian asks the crowd for help analyzing »

Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
What do we want? Unbiased reporting! When do we want it? During protests!
Not all protests get treated equally. Stories about women’s marches and anti-Trump protests give more voice to the protesters than those about Black Lives Matter and other anti-racism protests.
Instagram is busy fact-checking memes and rainbow hills while leaving political lies alone
Plus: Emphasizing a publisher’s name on social doesn’t seem to impact readers’ misinfo radar much one way or the other.
Is this video “missing context,” “transformed,” or “edited”? This effort wants to standardize how we categorize visual misinformation
MediaReview wants to turn the mishmash vocabulary around manipulated photos and video into something structured.