Two academics from NYU worry that the old binary system — a court document is either public or it’s not — doesn’t mesh well with a searchable online context, and that protecting access might mean rethinking it.
Plus: The debate over transparency and objectivity, more fallout from gun record publication, the Bradley Manning case, and the rest of the week’s media/tech news.
With volunteers around the country, the news nonprofit is continuing its efforts to figure out what works and what doesn’t when it comes to crowdsourced reporting.
With the ruling, the Knight News Challenge winner and judicial transparency project will be allowed to post video of public court proceedings online. Adrienne LaFrance
Coddington, Mark. "This Week in Review: Scrutinizing TechCrunch’s ethics, and a big test for ‘digital first’ at newspapers." Nieman Journalism Lab. Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard, 9 Sep. 2011. Web. 3 Jul. 2022.
APA
Coddington, M. (2011, Sep. 9). This Week in Review: Scrutinizing TechCrunch’s ethics, and a big test for ‘digital first’ at newspapers. Nieman Journalism Lab. Retrieved July 3, 2022, from https://www.niemanlab.org/2011/09/this-week-in-review-scrutinizing-techcrunchs-ethics-and-a-big-test-for-digital-first-at-newspapers/
Chicago
Coddington, Mark. "This Week in Review: Scrutinizing TechCrunch’s ethics, and a big test for ‘digital first’ at newspapers." Nieman Journalism Lab. Last modified September 9, 2011. Accessed July 3, 2022. https://www.niemanlab.org/2011/09/this-week-in-review-scrutinizing-techcrunchs-ethics-and-a-big-test-for-digital-first-at-newspapers/.
Wikipedia
{{cite web
| url = https://www.niemanlab.org/2011/09/this-week-in-review-scrutinizing-techcrunchs-ethics-and-a-big-test-for-digital-first-at-newspapers/
| title = This Week in Review: Scrutinizing TechCrunch’s ethics, and a big test for ‘digital first’ at newspapers
| last = Coddington
| first = Mark
| work = [[Nieman Journalism Lab]]
| date = 9 September 2011
| accessdate = 3 July 2022
| ref = {{harvid|Coddington|2011}}
}}
