HOME
          
LATEST STORY
The newsonomics of MLB’s pioneering mobile experience
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 28, 2011, 9:30 a.m.

Amazon’s sold (mumble mumble) of the new Kindles

They’re selling lots of them, but still no actual sales numbers from the ebook giant.

Okay, maybe it’s a minor point. And after Jeff Bezos rightfully taunted me on stage (an honor, really!) for something I wrote almost three years ago, I should probably shut up about the Kindle for a while.

But Amazon has just put out another press release talking about how great Kindle sales are without including a single actual sales number. Four years after launching the Kindle, Amazon has still not released one concrete number regarding either how many actual Kindle devices they’ve sold or how many Kindle books they’ve sold. To be clear, I have no doubt the number in both cases is “a bunch.” But I keep thinking back to what Steve Jobs said two years ago: “Usually, if they sell a lot of something, you want to tell everybody.”

We know, for instance, that Apple sold 14.8 million iPads in the last nine months of 2010 (it launched in April of that year) and 23.6 million in the first nine months of 2011. Amazon has never gotten any more specific than some variation of “millions of Kindles have been sold,” a numerical region it first referred to in January 2010. An IDC study in March estimated that Amazon had sold about 6.1 million Kindles in 2010. Is that accurate? Who knows?

Instead, Amazon loves making comparisons between unknown variables. Some of those comparisons are easily misinterpreted, such as when it announced in May that it was selling 105 Kindle ebooks for every 100 printed books — which led some people to write headlines like “About Time: Ebooks Outselling Printed Books.” (They’re not. Amazon has a 15-20 percent share of print book sales, whereas it’s the only vendor for Kindle ebooks. It’s like McDonald’s saying Shamrock Shake sales have passed Chicken McNugget sales — and extrapolating that out to mean that green Irish-themed shakes now outsell chicken in the United States.)

Here are today’s new unknowable comparisons for the new Kindles introduced eight weeks ago:

“Even before the busy holiday shopping weekend, we’d already sold millions of the new Kindle family and Kindle Fire was the bestselling product across all of Amazon.com. Black Friday was the best ever for the Kindle family — customers purchased 4X as many Kindle devices as they did last Black Friday — and last year was a great year,” said Dave Limp, Vice President, Amazon Kindle.

I’m sure it was! And “millions” over a specific, defined time span is an improvement from “millions” over a multi-year period. But would it really kill Amazon to say, directly: “We had a great launch for these new Kindles! We sold [positive integer] of them!” Without hard data, it’s hard for content producers to know how much effort to expend building for the platform.

This is a much bigger issue for news organizations and other periodical publishers than it is for book publishers. If you publish books, of course you need to invest time and energy into being on the Kindle. It’s the biggest game in town in a clear growth market. But the decision isn’t as clear cut for newspapers and magazines, which need to decide whether to put a slice of their development budgets into developing Kindle-specific editions of their publications.

(I’m not talking about Android apps, which the Kindle Fire can run and which have the benefit of also working on Android smartphones and tablets. I’m talking about the Kindle-specific mags and papers that only work on the Kindle platform.)

When a media company is deciding whether or not to build an iPhone app, an iPad app, or an Android app, they have real sales numbers — or, in Android’s case, activation numbers — to use when calculating whether it’s worth investing in the platform. On the Kindle, that’s harder. If sales numbers really are impressive, shout them from the rooftops!

POSTED     Nov. 28, 2011, 9:30 a.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
The newsonomics of MLB’s pioneering mobile experience
Running a sports league and running a news operation aren’t the same thing. But there are lessons to be learned from baseball’s success in navigating mobile.
Why The New York Times built a tool for crowdsourced time travel
Madison, a new tool that asks readers to help identify ads in the Times archives, is part of a new open source platform for crowdsourcing built by the company’s R&D Lab.
Opening up the archives: JSTOR wants to tie a library to the news
Its new site JSTOR Daily highlights interesting research and offers background and context on current events.
What to read next
1020
tweets
The newsonomics of the millennial moment
The new wave of news startups is aiming at a younger audience. But do legacy media companies have a chance at earning their attention?
803A mixed bag on apps: What The New York Times learned with NYT Opinion and NYT Now
The two apps were part of the paper’s plan to increase digital subscribers through smaller, targeted offerings. Now, with staff cutbacks on the way, one app is being shuttered and the other is being adjusted.
413The new Vox daily email, explained
The company’s newsletter, Vox Sentences, enters an increasingly crowded inbox. Can concise writing and smart aggregation on the day’s news help expand their audience?
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
Foreign Policy
The Washington Post
Newsmax
Public Radio International
InvestigateWest
The Tyee
FiveThirtyEight
La Nación
Outside.in
Sports Illustrated
The New Republic
Seattle Post-Intelligencer