Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
If you’re poor in the UK you get less, worse news — especially online, new research suggests
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Feb. 1, 2018, 2:41 p.m.
Audience & Social

Is Facebook celebrating time better spent, or time spent elsewhere?

“People have a great deal of time and emotional energy invested in their online communities. Asking them to throw these connections out and move to another network is a nonstarter.”

Facebook may be ensnared in the classic chicken-and-egg conundrum: Which came first, the News Feed priority changes or the shifting user engagement?

As Mark Zuckerberg celebrated a decrease in the time users spent on his platform, the first earnings report since Facebook announced its publisher-and-brand-demoting changes to the News Feed also noted that it lost daily users in North America for the first time in its history. Is this a sign of its News Feed changes successfully increasing more meaningful interactions, or were users already pivoting away?

“In total, we made changes that reduced time spent on Facebook by roughly 50 million hours every day. By focusing on meaningful connections, our community and business will be stronger over the long term,” Zuckerberg was quoted in the earnings press release.

He added in the conference call: “We expect Stories are on track to overtake posts in Feed as the most common way that people share across all social apps.”

In mid-December, researchers from Facebook acknowledged that too much time spent passively scrolling in the News Feed can be detrimental, and 11 days into 2018, Facebook announced the first round of News Feed changes — and then closed January with a renewed focus on local news. The adjustments to Facebook’s flagship product were significant, though news organizations had been watching their traffic from the platform decline for months and were bracing for further change. How many people have been distancing themselves from the site already?

Bloomberg’s Sarah Frier notes:

Even with regular users, Facebook has become thirstier for posts. The social network’s reminder boxes at the top of the news feed, which often show memories or anniversaries of friendship with close pals, have recently become real estate for more trivial milestones—like being tagged in 10 photos with someone or getting 100 heart reactions…

But engagement may have been a concern for Zuckerberg before the announcement. While the company has said it sees positive trends, it hasn’t updated a statistic on how much time people spend on its properties since the first quarter of 2016. Minutes spent on the site in the U.S. are declining, according to measurements by both Nielsen and Comscore, even if the trend is healthy globally. In the third quarter, the growth in daily users was the slowest ever.

“You could argue that the actions they announced were in response to what they were observing,” said Brian Wieser, an analyst at Pivotal Research. “Given how big they are, you’re going to run into a wall at some point.”

On these earnings, it’s important to note the decrease in daily units is small, comparatively; but Facebook’s daily active user audience increased by 32 million people in the fourth quarter, “the smallest quarter-over-quarter increase in two years.”

BuzzFeed’s Alex Kantrowitz pointed out earlier this week that Twitter has been on the rise as a referral source for publishers as Facebook traffic has declined. Twitter’s “emergence as a viable social traffic source could help dull the hit many publishers stand to take when Facebook’s News Feed changes roll out broadly in the coming months.” And back last year, Google topped Facebook in referral traffic for publishers.

So is this about time better spent, or time spent elsewhere? As Ethan Zuckerman, director of the Center for Civic Media at MIT, wrote in The Atlantic: “People have a great deal of time and emotional energy invested in their online communities. Asking them to throw these connections out and move to another network is a non-starter.”

Then again, we could all just do as social media executives do, not as they say.

POSTED     Feb. 1, 2018, 2:41 p.m.
SEE MORE ON Audience & Social
SHARE THIS STORY
   
 
Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
If you’re poor in the UK you get less, worse news — especially online, new research suggests
Poorer people are less likely to go straight to a news site, and the researchers found no online news brand that was read by significantly more poorer people than wealthier people.
College students broadly mistrust news. Fake Kardashian gossip probably won’t help.
“Why give them the ammo?”
Fewer mugshots, less naming and shaming: How editors in Cleveland are trying to build a more compassionate newsroom
“I didn’t see how we could justify standing on tradition when it was causing that kind of suffering…It really comes down to: How long does somebody have to pay for a mistake?”