Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Can U.S. journalism truly serve global audiences? Not if it treats them like an afterthought
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Oct. 30, 2008, 7:50 a.m.

Who will be the IMDB for books?

A plea for better metadata in book publishing, wondering who will be the industry’s IMDB.

Not everyone chooses a film because of who directs it or who the screenwriter was, but some of us do, and now with databases like IMDB we can easily find lists of films containing the actors we like, or directors and discover more things we might like to watch. I think books can be the same. Currently I don’t get to know who edits each book, or acquires the rights, but if I did I might start to follow their work. Authors need not be the only brands. Publishers can establish a brand identity the way imprints used to. Most will have to start over as they’ve diluted any meaning they ever had.

We all know superstar journalists who have established similar brands. Newspapers typically encourage it for columnists, and by default discourage it for reporters. What if newspapers made it trivially easy to be told every time there’s a new story by ace reporter Jane Doe? Or a big project edited by the local Pulitzer winner? Or a new photo shot by your brilliant portraitist? And papers promoted those individual talents accordingly?

POSTED     Oct. 30, 2008, 7:50 a.m.
SHARE THIS STORY
   
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Can U.S. journalism truly serve global audiences? Not if it treats them like an afterthought
What would a truly global media company look like?
“The idea and techniques of investigative reporting can be done by anyone anywhere”: How Francisco Vara-Orta wants to change IRE’s mission
“We all grew up with All the President’s Men. You don’t want to take away from the power of that moment and the press holding the administration accountable. But we have to think, why was there not a Black person or a woman on that team?”
KPCC and LAist are shifting the focus of their politics coverage from politicians to voters. Here’s why.
“Our goal is to reenergize demoralized readers and listeners who’ve given up on civic involvement amid all the vein-popping vitriol.”