Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Some midterm polls were on target, but finding which pollsters to believe can be tough
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Jan. 22, 2009, 9:14 a.m.

Many newspapers are healthy — some owners, not so much

Amid all the doom and gloom about newspapers laying off staff and closing bureaus and even — as in the case of Tribune Co., parent company of the Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times and Baltimore Sun — filing for bankruptcy, there has been very little attention paid to one of the main reasons for those cutbacks and business failures. And I’m not talking about a decline in journalistic principles or the sudden departure of advertisers for other online properties, or anything as apocalyptic as that. One of the main reasons has very little to do with journalism or even the Internet, and everything to do with the world of mergers and acquisitions.

That reason, as one or two astute observers have pointed out (including former newspaper exec Alan Mutter at his blog Reflections of a Newsosaur, and most recently a commenter at the popular political blog Talking Points Memo) is debt. In the case of Tribune Co. — acquired by corporate raider Sam “Grave Dancer” Zell — and several other major newspapers as well, acquisitions and corporate financing have created the conditions that led to much of the pain they have inflicted on the papers they own. Tribune Co. has built up a staggering debt load of $13-billion, and and chains like McClatchy have accumulated their own unwieldy debts over the past few years, by acquiring newspapers from family firms and smaller chains.

When the U.S. economy was strong, these acquisitions no doubt seemed like a slam-dunk. Despite declines in readership and some movement by advertisers to embrace the Web, many newspapers continued to spin off healthy amounts of cash as recently as a year or two ago, and many corporate chieftains including Zell saw them as a no-brainer kind of acquisition. As the economy has weakened and advertising in particular has declined, however, newspaper owners have found it harder to meet their debt obligations. That doesn’t mean their papers aren’t healthy, just that they aren’t profitable enough to make the payments on all that debt.

Do many newspapers have problems? Sure they do. They’ve dragged their feet when it comes to the online world, and many of them have focused on the wrong things in order to try and drive growth, as my NJL blogging colleague Martin Langeveld notes in his latest post here. And yes, print advertising has declined and online advertising isn’t making up the difference. Those are very real challenges. But they aren’t the only explanation — or even (I would argue) the primary explanation — for the pain that many newspaper chains are suffering right now.

POSTED     Jan. 22, 2009, 9:14 a.m.
Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Some midterm polls were on target, but finding which pollsters to believe can be tough
The outcomes confirmed anew that election polling is an uneven and high-risk pursuit.
Can Mastodon be a reasonable Twitter substitute for journalists?
Adam Davidson: “I think we got lazy as a field, and we let Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, and, god help us, Elon Musk and their staff decide all these major journalistic questions.”
11 (and counting) things journalism loses if Elon Musk destroys Twitter
Goodbye to screenshotted best bits, DMs, “that tweet should be a story”…