Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
How do audiences decide what news to trust? Fairness and accuracy aren’t the only things that matter
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Oct. 2, 2018, 4:34 p.m.
Reporting & Production

Why The New York Times TL;DR’d its own 14,218-word Trump investigation

“It seemed appropriate to do a still not short, but way more digestible, on-the-run version of the story.”

You could certainly read The New York Times’ massive investigation (14,128 words, by my count) into how Trump’s “self-made” fortune is not only not self-made but also involves tax fraud. But the Times knows that not everybody is going to do that. So on Tuesday afternoon, at the same time that it published the investigation that was a year in the making, it also aggregated itself — publishing “11 takeaways from the Times’s investigation into Trump’s wealth.” The TL;DR version is by the same authors as the full investigation (Russ Buettner, Susanne Craig, and David Barstow), and, at over 2,500 words, it’s pretty much a longread of its own. There’s also this much shorter interactive version, with audio and video.

“This is one of the longest stories that we’ve ever run in the news pages of the Times, one of the longest investigative stories we’ve run period,” said Paul Fishleder, who edited the story and who leads the Times’ political investigations unit (which was just formed back in May). “It’s a big, long, complicated story with many parts, and obviously we hope everyone reads it to the end, but we also know everyone’s not going to read it to the end. It seemed appropriate to do a still not short, but way more digestible, on-the-run version of the story.”

The Times has other plans to promote the story as well. On Tuesday afternoon, its reporters were tweet-threading the juiciest chunks, and the Times’ email alert included much of the story’s text.

The full story will run in (eight pages of) Wednesday’s print paper. As for the decision to publish on Tuesday afternoon, Fishleder said, “Needless to say, with a story this long, you don’t want to run it in the face of the fiercest news cycle, if that’s possible these days. We decided to do it at a time when we felt there was space for it to get maximum attention.”

POSTED     Oct. 2, 2018, 4:34 p.m.
SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
SHARE THIS STORY
   
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
How do audiences decide what news to trust? Fairness and accuracy aren’t the only things that matter
A new Reuters Institute report finds that editorial standards and journalistic practices may be less important for trust in news than audience impressions about brand reputations and the look and feel of how information is presented.
Facing “unprecedented demand,” The Dart Center for Journalism and Trauma expands (and adapts) its offerings
“We were changed by the practicalities of the pandemic. But we’re also changed by a radical shift of awareness in journalism of the challenges of covering these events, and the psychological costs to journalists of unremitting stress.”
Facebook is going to ask you more often what you want in your News Feed
“Is this post worth your time?” (Or is it at least a picture of people hugging?)