Nieman Foundation at Harvard
A Swiss publisher is trying to attract a paying audience with an app sampling stories across publications
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Oct. 13, 2015, 3:32 p.m.
Audience & Social
LINK:  ➚   |   Posted by: Shan Wang   |   October 13, 2015

Few people would have any moral qualms about quoting a single sentence from a 300-page book. But what about making a GIF out of a single play in a three-hour football game?

The NFL apparently feels that crosses the line from fair use into copyright infringement. The Twitter accounts for Gawker-owned Deadspin and the Vox Media-owned @SBNationGIF were suspended last night. (The Deadspin account returned online later in the night, but its suspension still counted as “inarguably, THE WORST REPRESSION OF FREE SPEECH IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND”. At the time of this post, @SBNationGIF was still suspended.) After much speculation over whether the NFL had directly demanded Twitter shut down the two accounts for posting league footage in the form of gifs or vines, a clearer picture has since emerged over what exactly happened.

sbnationgif-suspended-screenshotReps for the NFL, UFC, and college football’s Big 12 apparently sent takedown notices to Twitter, invoking the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, citing various pieces of copyright-infringing content posted to the @Deadspin and @SBNationGIF accounts. These organizations had sent multiple notices through third-party companies dedicated to scouring the Internet for potentially copyright-infringing content, according to some of takedown notices Twitter provided to Awful Announcing. (Anyone can report what they consider copyright infringing content on Twitter via the DMCA.)

Patricia Aufderheide, a professor at American University and director of its Center for Media & Social Impact, points out that often these copyright claims issued through outside companies hired by sports organizations are pretty common, and nothing terribly new. “Typically this is how takedowns happen — not through any human being,” Afderheide said. “People are handed over databases, and they then scour the web to find matching content, and when that matching content is found, an automatic takedown is sent, all without a real human being ever being involved.”

Aufderheide points to her center’s set of principles for fair use in journalism as a guide for journalists looking for some clearer answers on what content from another person or organization is okay to post and what isn’t.

“It’s a question of, are you substituting for the original purpose, or is there a transformative purpose? Am I in a position where I no longer need to find the original?” Deadspin’s GIFs, she said, could be considered “newsworthy” and a “perfectly plausible way of highlighting what’s significant” about the game in a fun way that makes people pay more attention.

@Deadspin and @SBNationGIF regularly post GIFs and vines of good plays (or just silly ones) from games, and have been doing so for a long time under implicit fair use claims. (Deadspin editor Timothy Burke has never been shy about journalists asserting their fair use rights.) Shouldn’t the NFL be okay with great plays reaching wider audiences, some would argue — isn’t that helping the sport, the same way traditional media coverage has?

But fair use has always proved to be a difficult set of guidelines for publishers, interpreted to varying degrees of strictness by various people, and for some, better safe than sorry. For others, Deadspin and SBNationGIF’s suspensions were out of line (some are now crying foul over NFL’s recent deal with Twitter).

While the Internet and the sports organizations try to figure it all out: RIP, @SBNationGIF. (These were produced using the Officially Licensed™ Madden GIFERATOR.)




Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
Join the 15,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
A Swiss publisher is trying to attract a paying audience with an app sampling stories across publications
Tamedia’s 12-App collects the 12 best stories each day from the company’s 20-plus publications.
What does it take to be a “full-service” digital journalism organization? Ask Discourse Media
“We’ve gone down lots of experimental rabbit holes.”
Spain’s has 18,000 paying members, and its eye on the next several million
“We have a potential of six million readers. You may not convince all six million people to be your socios, but if you learn more about their interests, you can get closer.”
What to read next
Hoping to redefine “trade publication,” Digiday launches Glossy, a vertical to cover disruption in fashion
“I hate the term ‘trade publication,’ because it implies being a boring cheerleader for the industry.”
0Chasing subscriptions over scale, The Athletic wants to turn local sports fandom into a sustainable business — starting in Chicago
“It’s very easy today to be click-driven and produce articles that don’t have a lot of substance or depth and don’t cost that much to produce, but that dynamic is disappointing for fans who want higher-quality content.”
0A year in at Vox, Recode looks at its future: Video, distributed content, more podcasts, and no /
“There’s a huge opportunity to be a widely read, digitally native business site that uses tech as our lens, and I don’t think that’s out there.”
These stories are our most popular on Twitter over the past 30 days.
See all our most recent pieces ➚
Fuego is our heat-seeking Twitter bot, tracking the links the future-of-journalism crowd is talking about most on Twitter.
Here are a few of the top links Fuego’s currently watching.   Get the full Fuego ➚
Encyclo is our encyclopedia of the future of news, chronicling the key players in journalism’s evolution.
Here are a few of the entries you’ll find in Encyclo.   Get the full Encyclo ➚
The Chronicle of Higher Education
The Atlantic
Davis Wiki
Kaiser Health News
Bureau of Investigative Journalism
Honolulu Civil Beat
The Wall Street Journal
Corporation for Public Broadcasting
The Bay Citizen