Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Journalists are burned out. Some newsrooms are fighting back.
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
July 24, 2009, 1:10 p.m.

Thinking about the economics of news over coffee

The Detroit Free Press recently staged a promotion with Panera, the baked-goods purveyor, that offers a nice lesson in the economics of charging for news. Patrons who purchased a cup of coffee could also grab a copy of the Freep for a penny. More than 1,600 people took advantage of the offer each day, according to the Newspaper Association of America, and single-copy sales of the Freep, which recently curtailed home delivery, remained elevated after the promotion ended.

Sounds like a smart promotion, but consider how it worked: charge for the coffee and give away the news. (They asked for a penny to count the copies as circulation under ABC’s recently loosened standards.) Economists will tell you that it’s easy to put a price on a private good like coffee because you can’t drink from my cup of joe once I’ve consumed it. But news is an information or public good, which means it lacks both rivalry (you can have the same news as me) and exclusion (you can obtain the news without paying for a newspaper). I’m cribbing here from Jay Hamilton’s book, All the News That’s Fit to Sell, which we discussed extensively in February.

There will always be a disconnect among the fixed costs of producing a newspaper (high), the value that society places on news (high), and the amount that economic theory says you can charge for an information good (nothing). So long ago, newspapers got into the business of selling a private good, its readers’ attention, to advertisers. That’s why the eyeball-maximizing penny press emerged in the 1830s and returned this year to Detroit.

POSTED     July 24, 2009, 1:10 p.m.
Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Journalists are burned out. Some newsrooms are fighting back.
Keeping reporters healthy over the long term often requires both systemic and behavioral changes, and getting buy-in often isn’t easy.
Disinformation often gets blamed for swaying elections, but the research isn’t so clear
“Our belief in free will is ultimately a reason so many of us back democracy in the first place. Denying it can arguably be more damaging than a few fake news posts lurking on social media.”
After LA Times layoffs, questions about diversity and seniority swirl
Disagreements between the LA Times and its Guild over seniority protections ended in more than 60 journalists of color being laid off.