Nieman Foundation at Harvard
Is the future about one all-knowing AI or many? The new app Poe gets you ready to chat with them all
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
June 14, 2022, 3:52 p.m.
Reporting & Production

Struggle, chaos, no regrets? Journalists love the work they do, despite industry challenges

Over 70% said they were proud of their work and would pursue a journalism career again.

Nearly three-quarters (72%) of American journalists describe the state of the news industry negatively, according to a new study by the Pew Research Center.

In the study, released Tuesday, journalists were asked to describe the industry in one word. Forty-two percent of them used words like “struggling,” “chaos,” “dying,” “declining,” or “under-resourced.” Seventeen percent used neutral words like “changing,” while just 9% used positive words like “important.”

Pew surveyed nearly 12,000 journalists in the United States between February and March 2022. Of those respondents, 77% were white, 8% were Hispanic, 5% were Black, 3% were Asian, and a combined 6% identified as “other” or did not answer. Men and women made up 51% and 46% of the respondents, respectively, while 1% identified as “another gender identity.”

Despite more negative feelings about the industry, journalists felt more positive about their actual jobs. Over 70% said they were proud of their work and would pursue a journalism career again.

They also feel that the industry is doing a good job “adapting to industry change.” As for “getting the story right,” well, there’s disagreement — 14% of respondents said that “getting the story right” is the thing the industry does the “best job” at these days. But 23% of respondents said that “getting the story right” is the thing the industry is doing the worst job at.

Journalists said newsroom growth has been been relatively stagnant, with 46% saying their newsroom is “mostly staying the same,” while 22% reported their organizations were cutting back and 30% said their outlets were expanding. At the same time, 41% said their salaries had increased while 50% said theirs stayed the same. Seven percent said their salaries decreased.

The Center also conducted two separate surveys of its panel of American adults, during the same time period, in order to compare the differences between the ways that journalists and the public view the journalism industry. Turns out there are major discrepancies between the way the press views itself and the way the public views it.

Journalists and the public were asked about five journalism functions: Covering the most important stories of the day, reporting the news accurately, serving as a watchdog over elected leaders, giving voice to the underrepresented, and managing or correcting misinformation.

“In all five areas, journalists give far more positive assessments than the general public of the work news organizations are doing,” the report’s authors noted. “And on four of the five items, Americans on the whole are significantly more likely to say the news media is doing a bad job than a good job.”

For example, 71% of journalists said made-up news and information is “a very big problem for the country,” compared to 50% of U.S. adults who said the same. Meanwhile, 40% of journalists said that news organizations are generally doing a bad job of managing or correcting misinformation, but 51% of U.S. adults said the same.

The survey also looked at how journalists view diversity in the industry and their individual newsrooms. Sixty-seven percent said that their newsrooms have “enough” gender diversity, but only 32% said the same about racial and ethnic diversity. Less than half of respondents (42%) said their newsrooms make diversity a “major priority.”

The way that journalists view their organizations’ progress varies based on demographics. Overall, white journalists and men were more likely to think that their organization treated everyone fairly regardless of gender, age, or race.

At the same time, white journalists and journalists ages 65 or older were less likely to participate in diversity, equity, and inclusion-related trainings and discussions, compared to Black, Hispanic, Asian, and journalists under 65.

You can read the full report here.

POSTED     June 14, 2022, 3:52 p.m.
SEE MORE ON Reporting & Production
Show tags
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Is the future about one all-knowing AI or many? The new app Poe gets you ready to chat with them all
Poe lets you use ChatGPT alongside a new rival named Claude — which seems to work better in important ways.
Google now wants to answer your questions without links and with AI. Where does that leave publishers?
A dozen years ago, Eric Schmidt forecast the AI pivot that’s playing out this week. And the questions it prompts — around the link economy, fair use, and aggregation — are more real than ever.
A journalistic lesson for an algorithmic age: Let the scientific method be your guide
“One of the best parts about using the scientific method as a guide is that it moves us beyond the endless debates about whether journalism is ‘fair’ or ‘objective.’ Rather than focus on fairness, it’s better to focus on what you know and what you don’t know.”