Twitter  Is the river behind your house rising? A British Twitter bot will tell you nie.mn/1kQfI9f  
Nieman Journalism Lab
Pushing to the future of journalism — A project of the Nieman Foundation at Harvard

Share your data! Tell us how your readers arrive at your site: search, social media, the front door?

Companies typically like to hoard the data generated by their operations. It’s a natural defense: The less their competitors know, the better. But limiting the free flow of data can also limit the growth of a sector; there’s real value in knowing how markets are evolving, what’s working and what’s not, or just what the current state of affairs is.

That’s true for web analytics, the mountains of data generated by a website’s audience as it reads stories, follows links, and consumes content. Tools like Google Analytics and Omniture produce lots of interesting data, and nowhere near all of it needs protecting — there’s lots to be learned from seeing how one site’s audience compares to another’s.

So I’m hoping that, if you run a news site, you’ll contribute to greater information sharing by answering four basic questions about how your readers arrive on your site.

The need for better data

I’m prompted by seeing Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo post yesterday about the growth in Facebook traffic to his site. In February, he said, 5.9 percent of visits to TPM came from Facebook, making it “the largest outside referrer to the site by a longshot.” Twitter, by contrast, generated only 1.7 percent. (Although I suspect he’s underestimating Twitter — see below.)

I’m also prompted by the discussion in the comments from Dennis Mortensen’s post in which he argues that news sites spend too much time optimizing for search (a.k.a. SEO) and not enough optimizing for generating clickthroughs from their front pages. His data, drawn from a number of news sites, found that nearly half of all article pageviews come from clicks on a site’s front page or section fronts.

Those are all really interesting data points, and I’m glad they’re being shared. But they’re by their nature individual data points. Just to speak from personal experience, here at the Lab, we get way more traffic from Twitter than from Facebook, and our front page barely generates 10 percent of our pageviews. Now, we’re a weird little news outlet — but everybody’s weird in their own way.

What I’d like to do is to increase the number of data points we have to look at. That’s where you come in.

How you can help

I’m asking any reader who helps run a news site to answer four simple, straightforward questions about how your readers arrive at your site. They should be easily answerable with just about any web analytics software, but if you use Google Analytics, I’ve included simple instructions that will let you find the numbers in just a few clicks.

And let’s define “news site” broadly — whether you work for a small hyperlocal site or The Wall Street Journal, a small-market TV station or Gawker Media, a tiny niche site or ProPublica, kottke.org or CNN.com.

Here are the four questions we’re asking:

1. What percentage of your traffic comes from search engines? (If you use Google Analytics, click “Traffic Sources” in the left sidebar, then look at the percentage next to “Search Engines” below the line graph.

2. What percentage of your traffic comes from facebook.com? (In Google Analytics, click “Traffic Sources.” Look under “Top Traffic Sources,” on the left side. If you see facebook.com listed, it’s the number under the “% visits” column — you’re done. Don’t see it? Click “view full report” underneath it. Then, on the right side of your screen below the line graph, you’ll see “Views:” followed by six buttons. Click the second one, the one that looks like a pie chart. You’ll probably see facebook.com as one of your top referrers; if not, search for it in the “Filter Source:” box at the bottom of the screen. The percentage for facebook.com will be in the third column, under “Visits.”)

3. What percentage of your traffic comes from twitter.com? (The instructions here are the same as for facebook.com — just sub in twitter.com wherever I mentioned facebook.com.)

4. What percentage of your site’s visits begin on your front page? (In the left sidebar, click “Content,” then “Top Landing Pages.” On the right side of your screen below the line graph, you’ll see “Views:” followed by six buttons. Click the second one, the one that looks like a pie chart. Look for your front page, which will usually be called simply “/” — for most sites, it’ll be the first page listed. The percentage will be in the third column, under “Entrances.”

Post your numbers in the comments, along with info on who you are and what site you’re writing about. If you want to add some commentary at the end, great, but that’s strictly optional. The goal here is to get enough data to see whether there are any interesting patterns to pick out.

I’ll start off, to give you an idea of the format to use. Here are the numbers for at the Nieman Journalism Lab:

Joshua Benton
Nieman Journalism Lab
www.niemanlab.org
Period: Last 30 days

1. 15.76 percent of our visits came from search engines
2. 2.93 percent of our visits came from facebook.com
3. 12.93 percent of our visits came from twitter.com
4. 7.61 percent of our visits started on our front page

At the Lab, we’ve invested a lot in Twitter, where we have over 42,000 followers. (Much more than on Facebook, where we have about 3,000 fans.) And our audience is unusually interested in new ways of consuming information, so they’d disproportionately tend toward social media even if we didn’t treat it as an important channel. So our numbers are a little unusual for a news site. That means people find out about our stories largely through social media and links, not by coming to niemanlab.org and clicking around.

[Note: Just to head off a concern, I'm aware that counting traffic from twitter.com really undercounts traffic from Twitter. People using Twitter apps like TweetDeck and Twitterrific don't generate twitter.com referrers, if they generate referrers at all. But counting those app-using tweeters is difficult, so for our purposes, let's just use twitter.com traffic with the acknowledgement that it undercounts Twitter traffic. In our case, 12.93 percent of our visits come from twitter.com, but around 30-35 percent of our total visits come from Twitter in some form — apps or no apps.]

Just leave your numbers in the comments, in something like the form above. Thanks kindly, and here’s to hoping we see some interesting data.

                                   
What to read next
Correctiv feature
Caroline O'Donovan    July 17, 2014
The new CORRECT!V is trying to find a place for foundation-supported media in Europe’s largest economy.
  • Pingback: Facebook Unveils the Secrets Behind the Like Button « The END – Extra News Digest

  • http://twitter.com/DennisMortensen Dennis R. Mortensen
  • http://twitter.com/thismagazine This Magazine

    Graham F. Scott
    Editor
    This Magazine
    http://this.org
    Last 30 days:

    Search engine traffic: 39%
    Facebook: 8% (and seems to be rising)
    Twitter: 3% (and seems to be falling)
    Front Page: 14%

    We’re a small Canadian progressive political magazine, so our readership is not large, but fairly dedicated.

    One thing that’s not reflected in the numbers above is that more than 40% of our traffic comes from “referring sites,” but much of that is probably search engine traffic in disguise. We have a prehensile legacy website still hanging around (thismagazine.ca) that sends some traffic, but most of those are searchers who stumble across the old site and then click through to the new one. One of these days we’ll shutter the old site completely, but with two staffers, it’s just not top of the to-do list.

    Interesting thing about Twitter and Facebook: we have ~5,100 Twitter followers (and have been tweeting longer) and just ~1,100 Facebook Fans, but FB clickthroughs are growing in relative terms, while Twitter clickthroughs, while still growing, make up a smaller and smaller part of the pie. It seems like a Facebook fan is more likely to a) see one of our links, and b) most important, click on it. While I think our Twitter links more and more get lost in people’s increasingly busy streams. Just a hunch, though.

  • Pierre Arthur

    Hello Josh,
    We spoke briefly at the Inma conference in Boston last december. Here are the numbers for Cyberpresse ( http://www.cyberpresse.ca ) the leading news French site in Quebec.

    FYI, we have around 2.3 million uniques monthly (comScore)

    Over the last 30 days:

    1. 42.26% Search engines (majority from Google)

    2. 7.46 % came from Facebook – we have 8279 fans but all of our Facebook traffic comes from shared articles thanks in part to the like button

    3. 62.56 % of the visits started on our front page

    4. 2 % Twitter ( 1% came from twitter.com – We have 87 654 followers)

  • http://MLTnews.com/ Dustin DeKoekkoek

    Dustin DeKoekkoek
    MLTnews
    http://MLTnews.com
    Period: Last 30 days

    1. 25.67 percent of our visits came from search engines
    2. 19.03 percent of our visits came from facebook.com
    3. 1.75 percent of our visits came from twitter.com
    4. 30.47 percent of our visits started on our front page

  • http://grandcoulee.com Scott Hunter

    Direct traffic — 88%
    Search — < 8%
    Facebook — .05%

    This is despite the fact that I regularly feed the FB and Twitter beasts automatically every time we upload a story (via Hootsuite) and also tease whats coming up.

  • http://grandcoulee.com Scott Hunter

    Direct traffic — 88%
    Search — < 8%
    Facebook — .05%

    This is despite the fact that I regularly feed the FB and Twitter beasts automatically every time we upload a story (via Hootsuite) and also tease whats coming up.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=9609488 Chris Krug

    Christopher Krug
    Oklahoma Watch
    http://www.oklahomawatch.org
    Period: Past 30 days

    1. 34.2 percent 4,803 visits came from search
    2. 16.8 percent from Facebook
    3. 11.2 percent from Twitter
    4. 25.2 percent from the index

    Oklahoma Watch is a nonprofit, investigative journalism initiative that launched in January. Our first investigation is examining Oklahoma’s nation-leading incarceration rate for women. So far, all stories on this site address this issue.

  • Pingback: Does a new report mean doom and gloom for local online news? Maybe, but here are few balancing factors » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism

  • Pingback: hungama - Does a new report mean doom and gloom for local online news? Maybe, but here are a few balancing factors

  • Pingback: Website Traffic | Does a new report mean doom and gloom for local online news? Maybe, but here are a few balancing factors » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism

  • Andrew Horan

    Andrew Horan
    President
    Shop-eat-surf.com

    We’re a business news and information site covering a slice of the apparel and footwear industries.

    Our year-on-year comps show double-digit growth in monthly unique visitors for each of the past 36 months.

    We use Google Analytics

    1. Search = 37% of visits in past 30 days.
    2. Facebook is our 3rd-ranked referrer, with 4.26% of traffic. (Direct is #1 with 44%.)
    3. Twitter.com is 27th-ranked referrer, with .13% of traffic.
    4. Home page is our 1st-ranked landing page, with 22% of total.

    Interesting notes:
    - We have 3x more Twitter followers than Facebook friends, but 400 times more traffic coming to us from Facebook (probably a smaller delta given the caveat you expressed earlier, but still quite a gap).
    - Our daily email alert, sent to our core audience of opt-ins and paying subscribers, presumably drives the high counts for both ‘direct’ as our top referrer and home page for our top landing page.