Twitter  Tips on human centered design from the folks behind @CensusReporter nie.mn/UOC2ZG  
Nieman Journalism Lab
Pushing to the future of journalism — A project of the Nieman Foundation at Harvard

Who owns newspaper companies? The banks, funds, and investors and their (big) slices of the industry

Who owns America’s newspapers?

In January, I detailed how a hedge fund named Alden Global Capital, which played a role in the shakeup at MediaNews Group, also had significant holdings in newspaper groups Freedom Communications, Philadelphia Newspaper Holdings, Journal Register Company, Tribune, and the Canadian newspaper firm Postmedia Network — all firms with current or recent bankruptcy status.

After noticing that Alden also owned, as of December 31, 3.91 percent of Gannett’s common stock, I surveyed all of the U.S. public newspaper companies to see whether Alden pops up elsewhere as well. It turns out that, other than Alden’s stake in Gannett, there’s little crossover between the principal investors in the public companies and those that have picked up the “distressed opportunities” created by trips through bankruptcy court.

First, here’s a set of slides detailing the top investors in each of the publicly-owned newspaper publishers. I’ve included among these News Corporation (both the class A and class B common stock), but for the rest of this analysis, News Corp. is excluded because its global multimedia holdings in film, television, magazines and book dwarf the entire rest of the American newspaper business. (Note: All holding and valuations throughout this post are as of December 31, 2010.)

Note that these lists include both institutional investments (banks, pension funds, hedge funds) and mutual funds (pooled investments owned by individuals or corporations). Either way, the listed investor can vote the shares and in theory could influence strategy — but without board seats real influence is minimal. Most of these investors are looking for growth or dividends, not operational involvement.

What stands out on these slides is that, with a few exceptions, ownership is diversified to the point that no single entity owns more than 10 percent. The exceptions are noteworthy but are longstanding stakes that don’t point to the kind of financial restructuring that Alden and others are signaling in the private post-bankruptcy sector of the business. The entire 10-percent-plus club consists of:

  • Edward W. Scripps Trust: 22.55 percent of E.W. Scripps. (The trust was established in 1922 for the benefit of Scripps heirs and has not invested outside of the Scripps group of papers.)
  • Berkshire Hathaway: 20.45 percent of Washington Post Company. (Also a long-term investment, acquired more than 30 years ago — Warren Buffett said recently he would never sell a single share, even though he was stepping down from the Post board.)
  • Ariel Investments: 18.95 percent of Lee Enterprises
  • GAMCO Investors: 13.07 percent of Journal Communications
  • Rupert Murdoch: 39.71 percent of News Corp. Class B common stock. (This gives Murdoch effective control, but in terms of market capitalization, his stake is just 13.1 percent.)

Which investors are making the biggest bets in the newspaper business? To find out, I aggregated and ranked the total newspaper holdings of all of the top investors in each company. Here’s the result (leaving out News Corp., as noted above):

Berkshire Hathaway‘s Washington Post Company holding, it turns out, is the biggest single investment in U.S. newspapers, with a current value of $759 million. Not far behind, though, is Vanguard, with $703 million invested through a variety of funds in every public newspaper company: Washington Post, A.H. Belo, Gannett, Journal Communications, McClatchy, New York Times, Scripps, Media General, and Lee Enterprises. If this were one big company, Vanguard would own 6.74 percent of it.

As Wall Street investments go, though, Vanguard’s across-the-board bet on newspapers is smaller than a rounding error — it has $1.4 trillion in invested assets, so its newspaper holdings are about 1/20th of a percent of its investments. And, to put the U.S. publishers in perspective versus the News Corp. juggernaut, Vanguard’s investment in News Corp. alone is worth $2.5 billion.

After Berkshire Hathaway and Vanguard, the list drops quickly to smaller investments by JP Morgan Chase ($543 million), Ariel Investments ($497 million), and BlackRock ($335 million). (BlackRock, with $3.6 trillion under management, is the world’s largest money manager and the sixth-largest owner of Gannett stock.)

A few names do cross over between the “distressed opportunities” investors I listed last month and those with some holdings of public (and not-quite-as-distressed) newspaper companies. They include:

  • Alden Global Capital: As noted above, it has a major stake in Gannett; it also owns 1.53 percent of McClatchy and 0.75% of Media General.
  • Credit Suisse: An investor in the Philadelphia Media Network, it also has 3.56 percent of A.H. Belo, 2.59 percent of Journal Communications, 3.26 percent of McClatchy, and 3.21 percent of Gannett.
  • JP Morgan Chase: With distressed holdings in Tribune, it also controls, through several funds, 4.07 percent of A.H. Belo, 11.50 percent of Gannett, 1.37 percent of Journal Communications, and 3.15 percent of Washington Post.

Generally, at all of these companies, the total institutional/mutual fund ownership is between 60 and 90 percent; insiders hold no more than single-digit percentages in the aggregate.

Conclusion: While Alden and others, using MediaNews as a base of operations, may be looking to engineer some mergers, consolidations, and realignments in the distressed sector, they don’t have a significant enough toehold in the more stable public sector to have a similar impact there. That doesn’t preclude the possibility of wider strategic moves beyond the potential for a MediaNews/Freedom combination (and perhaps other mergers or trades involving Tribune and Journal Register) — but they will have to result from persuasion rather than clout. MediaNews executive chairman Dean Singleton, in his new role as strategic dealmaker, will be one voice trying to do the persuading.

                                   
What to read next
BuzzFeed mobile
Caroline O'Donovan    
Ben Smith says it will be a guide through the noise of news in social media, and that journalists should realize they’re “part of a collaborative project with other news outlets.”
  • Pingback: Follow the Money Trail: Newspaper Company Ownership | Fit to Print

  • Tkarr

    Confusing headline — do you mean “They’re” and not “Their”

  • Tkarr

    Confusing headline — do you mean “They’re” and not “Their”

  • http://www.niemanlab.org/ Joshua Benton

    Nope, we mean “their.” As in “the slices of the industry that belong to them.”

  • http://www.niemanlab.org/ Joshua Benton

    Nope, we mean “their.” As in “the slices of the industry that belong to them.”

  • Anonymous

    Martin: Compliments on the exhaustive research. I’m puzzled, though, why you don’t add the various funds together into their true combined weight. For example, combining all the Gabelli (aka GAMCO) investments at Journal Communications puts its weight at 19.35 percent of the company, not the 13 you attribute. Similarly, Gabelli controls 13.22 percent of Media General’s stock if you add up all the instances.

    The Gabelli mutual funds won’t vote their shares any different than the investment company.

    Then there’s the whole Warren Buffett thing: in 2010, The Post Co. attributed only 14.4 percent of its revenue to newspapers; almost two-thirds came from Kaplan. The Post Co. is an education and TV company that owns a couple of newspaper titles and, like News Corp., needs to be handled with a distinct asterisk.

    Conversely, if you’re going to attribute Buffett’s investment in The Post Co., you shouldn’t neglect to mention his ownership of the Buffalo News.

  • http://www.facebook.com/martin.langeveld Martin Langeveld

    Hi dmcole: I wanted to list the top ownership slices in the same way they are reported to SEC, so the individual funds at GAMCO that own slices of Journal Communications are listed separately. But yes, for any of the companies, you could scan the list and combine pieces held in different funds within the same family, as you suggest.

    In the second chart window, I *did* combine holdings across all funds within a family to be able to compare and rank the total weight within the industry for the various investment firms, and I combined Gabelli and GAMCO.

  • thaiparampil

    v have no real press freedom in usa….

  • Pingback: NickGeidner.com » Data Visualization

  • Earl Wilkinson

    Great, great article, Martin. Follow the money … :-)

  • VIP

    If you own any of their stock, sell it quickly.

  • Pingback: Links: profit by giving away, The Week grows & Facebook is ‘a news org’

  • Eric Buskirk

    Martin. A very important (possibly more important) measure is the investment in these newspaper companies by creditors. So far we have seen a number of bankruptcies wherein the equity holders (those entities you have listed) end up with little or nothing. In my opinion, most newspaper companies will go through bankruptcy or some form of restructuring such that the debt holders will become significant shareholders.

  • Pingback: Alden Global Capital drops a shoe: Is the Journal Register acquisition prelude to more consolidation? » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism

  • Pingback: Is John Paton the savior newspapers have been waiting for? — Tech News and Analysis

  • Pingback: OnlineMagazine » Blog Archive » Is John Paton the savior newspapers have been waiting for?

  • Pingback: Is John Paton the savior newspapers have been waiting for? - Actualidad