Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Chat app Telegram, not much loved by the Russian government, still attracts a loyal readership for news
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Aug. 5, 2016, 9:32 a.m.
Mobile & Apps

Inspired by Purple, The New York Times will text readers behind-the-scenes updates about the Olympics

“What we’re trying to do is figure out if there a space between broadcast and a total human-powered one-on-one interaction — which obviously doesn’t scale easily — to see if we can have the best of both worlds.”

The New York Times wants text readers about the Olympic games in Rio — and it wants readers to text back.

Over the next three weeks, deputy sports editor Sam Manchester, one of dozens of Times reporters reporting from Brazil, will send readers periodic updates from the games. These won’t be generic news alerts, though. Manchester plans to give each of the 3 to 4 daily updates a personal touch, opting for smartphone snapshots, GIFs, emoji, and the kind personal tone people expect from texting.

The effort, the first of its kind for the Times, is a part of the news organization’s efforts to use SMS to develop a closer, more consistent personal relationship with mobile readers. And while there is no shortage of messaging apps it could have opted for, the Times chose SMS because it’s a simple technology already in the hands of almost everyone with a smartphone. The Times hopes to have tens of thousands of users sign up for the texts.

nyt-alert

“If you think about the other text conversations that show up on your lock screen — it’s your mom, it’s your significant other, it’s your friend. I think that if we can be there its a really powerful relationship that we can create,” said Andrew Phelps, product director at The New York Times (and a former Nieman Lab staffer). “We can essentially create these little moments in your life and reconnect you to us and, hopefully, viewing it from more of a product perspective, bring you back to our core platforms to read more of our journalism.”

Phelps said the Times’ project was inspired by politics news texting service Purple, which also combined texting with a loose, casual approach to news updates. The service, which recently announced plans to shift exclusively to Facebook Messenger, also regularly offers readers the opportunity to reply with certain keywords to get more information.

That functionality is here, too, with the Times project, which is designed to be a two-way effort between the newspaper and readers. People who get the texts will be able to talk back to Manchester, who’ll be able to read and respond to their feedback. To pull that off, the Times interactive news team created a custom interface (built, like Purple, on top of texting platform Twilio) that will let Manchester — with the help of a team in the Times newsroom — categorize responses based on certain keywords and reply to specific subsets of people based on what they say. Manchester will also be able to ask readers themselves what topics they would like to learn more about, which will help drive Manchester’s coverage. (“What should I ask Michael Phelps?”)

Marc Lavallee, Times editor of interactive news, said that with the effort, the paper is essentially using bot-like tech to “scale a human brain” to be able to converse with many people at once. If the Rio project is a success, this is an an idea that the Times hopes to offer in other contexts as well — both with planned events (think political debates) and unplanned ones as well.

“What we’re trying to do,” he said, “is figure out if there a space between broadcast, where everyone gets the same exact thing, and a total human-powered one-on-one interaction — which obviously doesn’t scale easily — to see if we can have the best of both worlds.”

Photo by Robert Couse-Baker used under a Creative Commons license.

POSTED     Aug. 5, 2016, 9:32 a.m.
SEE MORE ON Mobile & Apps
SHARE THIS STORY
   
Show comments  
Show tags
 
Join the 45,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Chat app Telegram, not much loved by the Russian government, still attracts a loyal readership for news
Meduza, Snob, TV Rain, BBC Russian, and RT weigh in on their publishing and promotion strategies on the platform, which survived a recent tussle with the country’s communications regulator.
мессенджер, выйдя невредимым из столкновения с правительством, собирает благодарную аудиторию для СМИ
Медуза, Сноб, Дождь, Русская служба Бибиси и Russia Today рассуждают о том, как привлечь и удержать читателей в Телеграме.
What will misinformation look like in 2030 (and will we be better at spotting it by then)?
But also, what if the studies are kinda flawed in the first place?