Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
There’s another reason the L.A. Times’ AI-generated opinion ratings are bad (this one doesn’t involve the Klan)
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 20, 2012, 10:01 a.m.
LINK: www.inma.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   March 20, 2012

Tarald Aano, editor of Norway’s Stavanger Aftenblad, calls for a new emphasis on explanation in a newspaper’s mission (look past the use of that awful word “edutainment”):

If we write about the Berlin Wall in 2012 without explaining it, many readers under 35 will drop out. If we report news that refers to dead politicians, however important they once were, we close the door for a lot of the people we desperately want to reach. And if we turn the age dimension 180 degrees, when we report on Spotify and Dropbox without giving any hint to our analog audience, we leave our older readers lost in space…

It sounds easy, we know. It sounds obvious, for sure. But do yourself a favour: Listen to the news, read the newspapers and Web sites — and look for explanations. Or, rather, look for all the small information that would open the stories for new audiences. Look for the things missing, the important keys for understanding.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
There’s another reason the L.A. Times’ AI-generated opinion ratings are bad (this one doesn’t involve the Klan)
At a time of increasing polarization and rigid ideologies, the L.A. Times has decided it wants to make its opinion pieces less persuasive to readers by increasing the cost of changing your mind.
The NBA’s next big insider may be an outsider
While insiders typically work for established media companies like ESPN, Jake Fischer operates out of his Brooklyn apartment and publishes scoops behind a paywall on Substack. It’s not even his own Substack.
Wired’s un-paywalling of stories built on public data is a reminder of its role in the information ecosystem
Trump’s wholesale destruction of the information-generating sectors of the federal government will have implications that go far beyond .gov domains.