Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
There’s another reason the L.A. Times’ AI-generated opinion ratings are bad (this one doesn’t involve the Klan)
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 9, 2012, 10:01 a.m.
LINK: newsosaur.blogspot.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   April 9, 2012

Newsosaur Alan Mutter recrunches the numbers from Pew’s look at newspaper business models and argues Pew underestimated the scope of the carnage. Instead of a 7-to-1 ratio of print dollars lost to digital dollars gained, Alan argues it’s more like 27-to-1.

(The difference is in who’s being analyzed. Alan’s looking at 2005 to 2011 and at industry-wide numbers. Pew was looking at narrower but more detailed data given anonymously from seven newspaper companies, representing 38 newspapers, and covering only the past couple of years.)

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
There’s another reason the L.A. Times’ AI-generated opinion ratings are bad (this one doesn’t involve the Klan)
At a time of increasing polarization and rigid ideologies, the L.A. Times has decided it wants to make its opinion pieces less persuasive to readers by increasing the cost of changing your mind.
The NBA’s next big insider may be an outsider
While insiders typically work for established media companies like ESPN, Jake Fischer operates out of his Brooklyn apartment and publishes scoops behind a paywall on Substack. It’s not even his own Substack.
Wired’s un-paywalling of stories built on public data is a reminder of its role in the information ecosystem
Trump’s wholesale destruction of the information-generating sectors of the federal government will have implications that go far beyond .gov domains.