Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Would you pay to be able to quit TikTok and Instagram? You’d be surprised how many would
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
April 24, 2012, 9:06 a.m.
LINK: blog.storyful.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   April 24, 2012

Malachy Browne of Storyful — “we deploy the ‘Human Algorithm’ to deliver international stories told through the social web” — has a good blog post detailing how his outfit works to verify (or debunk) videos, photos, and text from social media platforms:

Within an hour of the Pacific tsunami alert being issued on April 11, 2012, Twitter and YouTube abounded with videos purporting to show monster waves striking the coast of Sumatra and Aceh in Indonesia. However, these were versions of the devastating 2004 tsunami and other dramatic videos, reissued with the 2012 date. In December 2011, when a police officer was killed at Virginia Tech in the US, a picture of the 2007 massacre was widely circulated as the 2011 event. In both instances, Storyful was quickly able to debunk this content as false.

But how to verify what’s true? The challenge for news rooms in this new age of information overload is who and what to trust.

A lot of it is good old-fashioned journalistic skepticism, but the basic m.o. — search the media object for checkable details, use available digital tools to check them — is good advice.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Would you pay to be able to quit TikTok and Instagram? You’d be surprised how many would
“The relationship he has uncovered is more like the co-dependence seen in a destructive relationship, or the way we relate to addictive products such as tobacco that we know are doing us harm.”
BREAKING: The ways people hear about big news these days; “into a million pieces,” says source
The New York Times and the Washington Post compete with meme accounts for the chance to be first with a big headline.
In 1924, a magazine ran a contest: “Who is to pay for broadcasting and how?” A century later, we’re still asking the same question
Radio Broadcast received close to a thousand entries to its contest — but ultimately rejected them all.