Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Why won’t some people pay for news?
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
March 11, 2013, 12:18 p.m.
LINK: jimromenesko.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   March 11, 2013

wsj-daypart

Dayparting is nothing new for broadcasters, but for newspapers, it’s still often hard to match up journalists’ output with the consumption patterns of the audience. Print-centric workflows still lead to a lot of stories being filed and published later in the day, despite online news readership being stronger in the morning.

This chart from The Wall Street Journal’s Raju Narisetti (via Romenesko) is an excellent visualization of that. Raju:

The green line in the chart below is when readers come to us looking for the terrific journalism WSJ promises them, as measured in the % of daily readers who come, each hour.

The blue line was when we were publishing our stories, by the hour, in 2011-12.

The red line shows how all of you moved the needle significantly in recent months to get more of your great journalism to your audiences when more of them were looking for it on our site.

Times in the chart are all Eastern, despite the WSJ’s global reach. Note what used to be a spike in story publishing from 4 p.m. to 8 p.m. — the traditional newspaper time for copy to move — is now somewhat more even through late morning and early afternoon.

Would be curious to see these numbers for the WSJ’s tablet and smartphone offerings, since mobile device peak consumption times actually line up pretty well with the old newspaper timetable. And don’t forget our Q&A with Raju from last week.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Why won’t some people pay for news?
Plus: The role of class in news avoidance, how local party leaders use partisan media, and what native advertising studios say to sell their work.
How corporate takeovers are fundamentally changing podcasting
“One of the recent shifts in podcasting has been the introduction of paywalls and exclusive content. It has since become a standard feature of the medium.”
Facebook promised to remove “sensitive” ads. Here’s what it left behind.
Facebook pledged to remove race, health conditions, and political affiliation from ad-targeting options, but The Markup found advertisers can still easily target the same people.