Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Newsonomics: Nikkei’s Tsuneo Kita: “Without the FT, it wouldn’t have been possible for us to transform ourselves as we have”
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 4, 2014, 12:46 p.m.
LINK: www.nytimes.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   November 4, 2014

Election Day (more accurately, Election Night) is a great time for news organization to show off a little — to break out the visualizations, the maps, the real-time dashboards, the livestreamed video, and all the other digital tools in their toolkit. Like the Olympics and political conventions, election nights are both big and scheduled, meaning they can get months and months of planning. But most of the flash still relies on an old-fashioned set of numbers — the current rolling vote totals of each candidate. That’s what TV networks were posting up on set walls back in the 1950s, and that’s what you’ll see on most news sites tonight.

So this new data visualization, debuting tonight at The New York Times’ The Upshot, feels like one of the most important innovations we’ve seen. Amanda Cox and Nate Cohn:

More sophisticated analysts interpret leads through the lens of the outstanding votes. “There’s a lot of votes left to be counted in heavily Democratic Cuyahoga County,” Jeff Greenfield said on CNN in 2004. “Remember, some of the votes outstanding are down here in Marion County where Obama is winning,” John King said on the same network in 2008.

This year, The Upshot will aim to let you be your own John King. In about a dozen of the closest Senate races, we, like many others, will track the leads reported by The Associated Press. But we will also adjust those leads based on what we know about where the votes have come from. Our adjusted leads will be based solely on current and historical returns. They will not use data from exit polls, or any forecasts from Senate models. You’ll be able to find a link to the tracker on The Times’s midterm page and The Upshot’s home page.

So when a candidate takes an early lead in the hours after polls close, is that real or an artifact of where the early votes are coming from? If you know the historical data around specific precincts — how Democratic or Republican they’ve voted in the past — and you can make informed estimates about turnout, you can read into those numbers. (“Our adjusted leads will be based solely on current and historical returns. They will not use data from exit polls, or any forecasts from Senate models.”) Smart analysts have always done this; now readers will be able to see it in real time, not just in tossed-off anecdotal comments. Very smart.

Here’s how it would have worked in the Mississippi Senate primary earlier this year:

upshot-nyt-adjusted-lead

By the end of the night, those two lines will end up at the same point. But if you want to know who’s ahead in a Senate race at some point this evening, these Upshot estimates will probably get to that point a little sooner.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Newsonomics: Nikkei’s Tsuneo Kita: “Without the FT, it wouldn’t have been possible for us to transform ourselves as we have”
“On-the-ground collaboration, on-the-ground communication, on-the-ground exchange are all getting to be more like business as usual.”
It is still incredibly easy to share (and see) known fake news about politics on Facebook
Plus: “Like the experts predicted back in 2016, we did end up heading down the dystopian path.”
Newsonomics: How the Financial Times is building mini-brands within the global FT
“The point is they have personality. They have character. They’re engaging, and they have really inside stuff. So, they’re more than newsletters. They are mini-brands that have events and forums around them — but the newsletter is almost the spearhead.”