Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Axios launches a premium subscription product aimed at the “dealmakers” among us
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Aug. 19, 2016, 1:34 p.m.
Audience & Social
LINK: blog.twitter.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   August 19, 2016

Yesterday, Twitter rolled out a couple new enhancements that it says will “give you more control over what you see and who you interact with on Twitter” and help you “control your experience.” Two words that don’t appear in the announcement: “abuse” or “harassment.” But those are the underlying issues they’re trying to tackle.

The first change allows everyone to see only people they follow in their notifications and mentions:

Don’t want to see notifications from everyone? Starting today, everyone will have the ability to limit notifications to only people they follow on mobile and on twitter.com. Simply turn it on if you want to give it a go. If not, no worries — your individual Twitter experience will continue unchanged.

The second is a “quality filter” that was previously available to only verified users, who make up only about 0.06 percent of Twitter’s user base.

Turning on the quality filter can improve the quality of Tweets you see by using a variety of signals, such as account origin and behavior. When turned on, it filters lower-quality content, like duplicate Tweets or content that appears to be automated — it does not filter content from people you follow or accounts you’ve recently interacted with. Please note that the quality filter may also affect Tweets in other places outside of the notifications timeline, such as top search results and replies on Twitter.

Now, when the quality filter debuted for verified users last year, the in-app description was quite explicit about the fact that among its most significant purposes was removing “threats” and “offensive or abusive language”:

That specific language is now gone; the current description only that it “improves the quality of the Tweets you’ll see”:

The unhelpfully unspecific language was noticed by Erin Kissane, who tweeted about it this morning:

Photo of Twitter’s San Francisco headquarters by Matthew Keys used under a Creative Commons license.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Axios launches a premium subscription product aimed at the “dealmakers” among us
After a two-week free trial, Axios Pro costs $600/year for one newsletter or $1,800/year for all Pro newsletters. (There’s no monthly option.)
A new report shows the impact of racial justice protests in 2020 on three local newspapers
A study of crime reporting in three major U.S. dailies found coverage included less dehumanizing language by the end of the year.
Does having stronger local newspapers make people more likely to follow COVID safety guidelines? Er, not so much
A new study finds that the more local newspapers there were in a county, the worse it performed on a measure of social distancing in the early days of the pandemic. But take the findings with a grain of salt.