Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
What’s up with all the news photos that make beaches look like Covid hotspots?
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 8, 2016, 12:58 p.m.
Reporting & Production
LINK: www.slate.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Ricardo Bilton   |   November 8, 2016

Slate and Vice want to shake up the way that news organizations report on election results. So far, no one is quite sure whether that’s a good thing.

With VoteCastr, the two companies are experimenting with offering real-time projections on who is leading the race in over 100 battleground state precincts. It’s a wholesale departure from the traditional approach of news organizations, which have waited until polls have closed before they reported results and called states.

As of 12:30 p.m. EST, VoteCastr estimated that Hillary Clinton leads in five of the six states for which it’s collecting data.

Slate and Vice say that the goal is to break up the monopoly on information that campaign teams and reporters have on turnout information. (Here’s a more detailed explanation of how the data collection and predictions work.)

Since it was announced this summer, the project has been contentious, particularly among poll watchers and political reporters who are concerned that reporting on election results in real-time could suppress voter turnout. The concern goes back to 1980, where a clear early Reagan win was blamed for downballot Democratic losses in Western states. Those claims have never been backed up by hard data, though.

While it’s still too early to say what effect, if any, VoteCastr’s turnout modeling will have on voters, news organizations like Bloomberg haven’t been shy about reporting on Votecastr’s predictions. Markets, too, are moving based on the project’s early numbers.

On the other hand, critics of the project say that the real-time projections only add to the confusion of election day, particularly if Slate and Vice do a poor job of untangling and contextualizing the numbers.

Others have spotted some errors with the effort’s results and methodology, which is understandable given the experiment nature of the project. In one case, observers noted that VoteCastr is including Jill Stein in its Nevada predictions, despite Stein not appearing on the ballot in that state.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
What’s up with all the news photos that make beaches look like Covid hotspots?
Plus: All misinformation is local; a very specific kind of Covid-19 misinformation in Facebook parent groups; and “religious clickbait.”
In the arena: Ken Doctor is moving from “media analyst” to “media CEO” with Lookout, his plan for quality local news
Lookout doesn’t want its local news sites to be a supplement or alternative to the local daily. They aim to be the news source of record in their communities, outgunning their shrunken newsprint rivals from Day 1.
People who engage with false news are hyper-concerned about truth. But they think it’s being hidden.
“On Google, searching for ‘coronavirus facts’ gives you a full overview of official statistics and visualizations. That’s not the case for ‘coronavirus truth.'”