Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Condé Nast is “no longer a magazine company,” its CEO says
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
Nov. 8, 2016, 12:58 p.m.
Reporting & Production
LINK: www.slate.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Ricardo Bilton   |   November 8, 2016

Slate and Vice want to shake up the way that news organizations report on election results. So far, no one is quite sure whether that’s a good thing.

With VoteCastr, the two companies are experimenting with offering real-time projections on who is leading the race in over 100 battleground state precincts. It’s a wholesale departure from the traditional approach of news organizations, which have waited until polls have closed before they reported results and called states.

As of 12:30 p.m. EST, VoteCastr estimated that Hillary Clinton leads in five of the six states for which it’s collecting data.

Slate and Vice say that the goal is to break up the monopoly on information that campaign teams and reporters have on turnout information. (Here’s a more detailed explanation of how the data collection and predictions work.)

Since it was announced this summer, the project has been contentious, particularly among poll watchers and political reporters who are concerned that reporting on election results in real-time could suppress voter turnout. The concern goes back to 1980, where a clear early Reagan win was blamed for downballot Democratic losses in Western states. Those claims have never been backed up by hard data, though.

While it’s still too early to say what effect, if any, VoteCastr’s turnout modeling will have on voters, news organizations like Bloomberg haven’t been shy about reporting on Votecastr’s predictions. Markets, too, are moving based on the project’s early numbers.

On the other hand, critics of the project say that the real-time projections only add to the confusion of election day, particularly if Slate and Vice do a poor job of untangling and contextualizing the numbers.

Others have spotted some errors with the effort’s results and methodology, which is understandable given the experiment nature of the project. In one case, observers noted that VoteCastr is including Jill Stein in its Nevada predictions, despite Stein not appearing on the ballot in that state.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Condé Nast is “no longer a magazine company,” its CEO says
“If you’re just an advertising-supported print publication, I think you have a difficult future,” said Condé Nast CEO Roger Lynch.
How many bots are on Twitter? The question is tough to answer — and misses the point
“We have observed a broad spectrum of behaviors mixing the characteristics of bots and people.”
Reader comments on news sites: We want to hear what your publication does
What is your news site doing with reader comments these days?