Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
June 16, 2017, 12:47 p.m.
Mobile & Apps
LINK: qz.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Ricardo Bilton   |   June 16, 2017

Donald J. Trump contains multitudes. The president’s 140-character official statements have been a source of much schadenfreude on Twitter, where critics — with no shortage of glee — regularly surface old statements from the president that contradict recent stances or otherwise foreshadow current critiques of Trump’s own presidency. There’s a tweet for every occasion.

In an effort to see if tech could automate these juxtapositions and possibly surface humans can’t spot, the Bot Studio at Quartz recently created Trump of Yore, a tool that automatically scans new Trump tweets and compares them to tweets in the president’s pre-inauguration 12,647-tweet archive, posting the comparisons to Twitter

The tool can’t consistently create ironic juxtapositions between Trump’s previous and current stances (armchair political commentators are safe for now), but it does often do a decent job of comparing tweets about similar ideas and topics. Some results work better than others: An anti-Obamacare tweet this week was aptly compared with September 2013 one about the law’s effect on American jobs and healthcare premiums. On the other hand, a tweet on Friday about the FBI investigation doesn’t seem to have much in common with a 2013 tweet about Lance Armstrong’s interview with Oprah Winfrey.

(Jargon-averse readers, avert your gaze: On the back end, each new tweet is chopped up into small parts called “vectors,” each of which is assigned a number. These numbers are then compared to those from earlier tweets, and once a mathematically similar match is found, both the tweets are posted to Twitter. Or at least that’s my understanding. John Keefe goes into much geekier detail in a post on the Quartz Bot Studio Blog.)

The bot’s tech is based on work from researchers at Carnegie Mellon, who argued in a 2016 paper that this kind of semantic analysis could help track infectious diseases on social media. Keefe said that there are certainly other journalistic applications as well, particularly around automated ways of surfacing similar clusters of tweets.

“Computers are much better at this than humans are,” Keefe said.

Quartz Bot Studio, which launched last November, is working a set of automated tools for journalists it hopes will improve certain parts of the reporting and writing process. Trump of Yore will certainly inform those later projects, some of which will launch this fall.

Show tags Show comments / Leave a comment
 
Join the 50,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
“This puts Black @nytimes staff in danger”: New York Times staffers band together to protest Tom Cotton’s anti-protest op-ed
“It has never been my expectation that every piece the New York Times publishes will confirm my personal worldview, but it was also never my expectation The Times would run an op-ed calling for state violence.”
The Philadelphia Inquirer’s journalists of color are taking a “sick and tired day” after “Buildings Matter, Too” headline
“We’re tired of shouldering the burden of dragging this 200-year-old institution kicking and screaming into a more equitable age.”
VizPol takes a cue from bird-watching apps to help journalists identify unfamiliar political symbols
Built by researchers at Columbia University’s journalism and engineering schools and launched as an invite-only beta this week, VizPol can currently recognize 52 symbols.