• Fellowships
  • Reports
  • Lab
  • Storyboard
    • Nieman Foundation at Harvard
    HOME
    About
    Subscribe
    Archives
              
    Foundation
    Reports
    Storyboard
    LATEST STORY
    Journalists fight digital decay
    Business Models Mobile & Apps Audience & Social Aggregation & Discovery Reporting & Production
    ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
    March 28, 2019, 12:11 p.m.
    Reporting & Production
    “Of the 21 news organizations in our study, 19 were not taking any protective steps at all to archive their web output”
    LINK: www.cjr.org  ➚   |   Posted by: Christine Schmidt   |   March 28, 2019

    When’s the last time you really archived a story? Maybe…never, considering Google Docs and GitHub, both privately owned, don’t really count.

    In what should hopefully be a reality check for many, Columbia University researchers Sharon Ringel and Angela Woodall analyzed the archiving mindsets and habits of the journalism industry through interviews with 48 individuals across 30 total organizations starting in March 2018. For a field that likes to consider itself the author of the first draft of history, the vast majority of those authors don’t prioritize how to save and share that history in the future.

    “Preserving digital content is not, first and foremost, a technical challenge. Rather, it’s a test of human decision-making and a matter of priority. The first step in tackling an archival process is the intention to save content,” Ringel and Woodall wrote in their report published in Columbia Journalism Review today.

    Here are some of the direct quotes from those interviews — it’s not hard to see why they are off-base:

    1. “If it’s in a Google Doc, it’s sort of there forever. Right?”
    2. “It’s been preserved on the website.”
    3. “News is about what is new and now, in the present, and not about the past.”
    4. “The difference between digital-only and print organizations is that we try to keep everything in circulation. We don’t [have] to preserve things for the record. We have to keep the record publicly available.”
    5. “What is useful for production [a CMS] is not necessarily the thing that’s useful for history.”
    6. “Thank God for the Internet Archive.”

    While blessings should indeed be bestowed upon the Internet Archive and others who build mission-driven records of history, the responsibility of public record preservation is a shared burden. (And Google Doc permissions can always be revoked/passwords lost!)

    There’s a number of preexisting efforts to store and share journalism, Ringel and Wooddall note, though those are largely driven by newspaper consortiums and private companies like Ancestry.com’s Archives.com and Newspapers.com (and yes, they also mention blockchain): “There exist a number of other archiving initiatives, by both individuals and nonprofits, from which news managers can learn or enlist services, including PastPages by Ben Welsh, NewsGrabber by Archive Team, and Archive-It by the Internet Archive. According to news organizations, for digital archiving efforts to succeed, the process must be made simple, both in terms of implementation and workflow.” (Preservation efforts are also trying to take off in the podcast realm.)

    RELATED ARTICLE
    Here’s how The New York Times is trying to preserve millions of old pages the way they were originally published
    April 12, 2018
    They highlight The New York Times’ work at building out its own archive as the golden standard, but as we reported last year, that’s the work of:

    a core team that works on the Times’s archiving efforts, which are part of a broader internal effort called Project Kondo (as in, life-organizing phenomenon Marie Kondo) to review old features and initiatives on the site — and then decide what to save and what to shut down.

    Let journalism archives spark future joy.

    Show tags
     
    What’s the best way to follow how the news is changing?
    Our daily email, with all the freshest future-of-journalism news.
    Prefer a once-a-week email? »
    The latest from Nieman Lab
    Journalists fight digital decay
    Basile Simon
    A generation of journalists moves on
    Meena Thiruvengadam
    Prediction markets go mainstream
    Taylor Lorenz
    Maybe we really are done with news?
    Matt Carlson
    A new generation of knowledge management tools
    Jeremy Gilbert
    Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
    Journalists fight digital decay
    “Physical deterioration, outdated formats, publications disappearing, and the relentless advance of technology leave archives vulnerable.”
    A generation of journalists moves on
    “Instead of rewarding these things with fair pay, job security and moral support, journalism as an industry exploits their love of the craft.”
    Prediction markets go mainstream
    “If all of this sounds like a libertarian fever dream, I hear you. But as these markets rise, legacy media will continue to slide into irrelevance.”
    Help advance the Nieman Foundation’s mission “to promote and elevate the standards of journalism” by making a donation.

    To promote and elevate the standards of journalism

    Covering thought leadership in journalism

    Pushing to the future of journalism

    Exploring the art and craft of story
    © 2024 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College  /  Some rights reserved
    Harvard Trademark Privacy Digital Accessibility
    Walter Lippmann House    One Francis Ave.    Cambridge, MA 02138    617 495 2237