Report for America — the ambitious two-year-old initiative from Steve Waldman and Charlie Sennott aiming to put 1,000 journalists into underserved U.S. newsrooms over five years — was modeled in part after Teach for America, another ambitious network with its own set of issues.
It’s one thing to get a large applicant pool, another to secure the funding to pay them, and then to do it again. Those indeed are feats to be recognized! (And yes, they got a New York Times profile.) But the question that hasn’t fully been answered is the impact of these reporters in communities whose local media had been washed away — or maybe never really trusted to begin with. And it was up to these new-to-town reporters, who may not stay put after funding runs out, to work on it.
“We see huge opportunity in someone not from that place, seeing it for the first time, and getting to know a different part of the country. That’s a good skill for a journalist: You come with really fresh eyes, but you also have to know that you’re going to into a community to serve the community. We’re trying to toggle between the two,” Sennott told my colleague Laura Hazard Owen when RFA launched in September 2017, though he also noted “great value” in half of the corps members coming from within the communities they reported in.RFA has now been through a few cycles of reporters — so, any luck? Andrea Wenzel, Sam Ford, Steve Bynum, and Efrat Nechushtai — all fellows at Columbia’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism — have compiled a report, based on six months of research and actually talking with local residents, about this very question.
“Entering communities where mutually beneficial relationships between residents and news outlets may have collapsed — or were never established — where can Report for America fellows begin? Can they build trust? And how do they balance their mission to offer coverage for the communities they are covering with the structural necessity to appeal to the broader audiences of their outlets?” they write.
The authors examined RFA’s work in Pike County, Kentucky, and Chicago’s majority-minority Austin neighborhood. The former had one RFA reporter tasked with reopening the Lexington Herald-Ledger’s bureau covering 13 counties and the Chicago Sun-Times hosted two RFA reporters to provide more nuanced coverage of two-thirds of the city where many black and Latinx residents live. Important note: “Each case demonstrates why anyone attempting an intervention in a local news ecosystem must be mindful of place and power dynamics.”
We talk a lot about media literacy but not nearly enough about community literacy among journalists. https://t.co/94NV5FOSpi
— Ashley Alvarado (@AshleyAlvarado) May 5, 2019
Here are some of their top findings from focus groups with Kentucky and Austin residents, as well as recommendations:
Alrighty. Here are the topline recommendations the authors (and focus group participants) came up with, with more detail in the full report:
- Support coverage for communities.
- Balance concerns for scale with ability to demonstrate impact.
- Find additional opportunities to support collaborations.
- Source reporters locally.
- Consider supporting communities over time.
- Focus on adequate communication and mentorship support.
- Incentivize engagement.
RFA received almost a thousand applications for its 61-member 2019 cohort, where “one-third of the corps members will be reporting in a place they call home.”
Leave a comment