Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Audience editors offer advice for “dispiriting” times in social and search
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
July 23, 2019, 2:16 p.m.
LINK: www.huffpost.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Joshua Benton   |   July 23, 2019

Mic was an easy company to make fun of. (I guess I technically shouldn’t use the past tense, since Bustle Digital Group is still churning out content at the URL. But I mean the ur-Mic, the one that laid everybody off and had a firesale of its brand assets last November.) There was such a disconnect between its high-minded rhetoric and its editorial strategy, which — with important exceptions! — seemed largely based on low-grade aggregation of things that make liberal millennials so mad. (Things Mic actually said out loud at some point: Mic “is the Voice Of the Future, and Will Make Millennials Part Of the Political Process.” Mic “is the voice of our generation.”

But Mic was also, in its way, an exemplar of a certain generation of social-fueled, millennial-seeking digital news site, one that got lots wrong but a few important things right. So I’m glad that HuffPost’s Maxwell Strachan went deep in this new piece on what happened to the onetime industry darling. Here are a few of the highlights and lowlights:

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Audience editors offer advice for “dispiriting” times in social and search
Journalists assume readers are as obsessed with the news as they are. They’re wrong.
Universities are mapping where local news outlets are still thriving — and where gaps persist
“Just as the local news landscape has evolved, so has local news mapping.”
The Conversation is trying to make its academia-fueled model work for local news
“I get the challenges small startups face trying to fill this void of local news. So this is our little attempt to support them in our Conversation way.”