Nieman Foundation at Harvard
HOME
          
LATEST STORY
Seeking “innovative,” “stable,” and “interested”: How The Markup and CalMatters matched up
ABOUT                    SUBSCRIBE
July 31, 2020, 1:12 p.m.
LINK: www.washingtonpost.com  ➚   |   Posted by: Sarah Scire   |   July 31, 2020

The Washington Post for the first time publicly released demographic information for its newsroom and business operations.

Across all of the news organization’s employees, the percent of white employees is 57 percent — the same as 2015. The share of Black employees, however, dropped from 27 to 20 percent over the same time period. Here are the figures for the organization as a whole:

That decrease appears to come primarily from the business side, where the share of Black employees went from 36 to 27 percent overall and from 25 to 22 percent within leadership. Among news and editorial, the percent of Black journalists dropped, but less dramatically (11 to 9 percent). The District of Columbia — home to the Post — is 46 percent Black and 46 percent white, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

Roughly 11 percent of Washington, D.C. residents identify as Hispanic or Latino. Just 5 percent of the Post’s newsroom and 3 percent of its newsroom leadership said the same. The share of white journalists decreased from 75 to 71 percent newsroom-wide. (Over the same time period, the proportion of those who chose not to disclose their race/ethnicity increased to 4 percent.) Here are the newsroom figures:

As the Washington Post Guild put it, the numbers indicate “there is still much work to be done.” The union published its own report in 2019 that found women, as a group, were paid less than men and that pay disparities between white men and people of color were particularly pronounced. The report, which the newspaper itself called “seriously flawed” because of the limited employment information it made available for analysis, found that median salary was $117,452 for white men and $86,511 for women of color.

The Post’s demographic report, which will now be released annually, comes as major newsrooms are fielding calls to diversify their newsrooms and improve racial representation in their coverage. At The Los Angeles Times, staff centered the newsroom’s demographic information — and, in particular, the relative lack of Black and Hispanic journalists — in their high-profile pushback over racial representation and hiring practices at the paper.

Even after the report’s release, some questions remain for The Washington Post. The newspaper, which was purchased by Jeff Bezos in 2013, included demographic information for just the past five years. (Did it not collect information on its staff racial, ethnic, and gender makeup before 2015?) Despite some public requests, the paper did not release the underlining demographic data or share how the report defines a leadership role. Nieman Lab asked for clarification, too, and we’ll update this post with any comment. In the meantime, you can read the full report here.

Show tags
 
Join the 60,000 who get the freshest future-of-journalism news in our daily email.
Seeking “innovative,” “stable,” and “interested”: How The Markup and CalMatters matched up
Nonprofit news has seen an uptick in mergers, acquisitions, and other consolidations. CalMatters CEO Neil Chase still says “I don’t think we’ve seen enough yet.”
“Objectivity” in journalism is a tricky concept. What could replace it?
“For a long time, ‘objectivity’ packaged together many important ideas about truth and trust. American journalism has disowned that brand without offering a replacement.”
From shrimp Jesus to fake self-portraits, AI-generated images have become the latest form of social media spam
Within days of visiting the pages — and without commenting on, liking, or following any of the material — Facebook’s algorithm recommended reams of other AI-generated content.